You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original Article
General practice critical incident reviews of patient suicides: benefits, barriers, costs, and family participation
  1. E King1,
  2. K Kendall1,
  3. R Wiles1,
  4. H Rosenvinge2,
  5. C Gould1,
  6. A Kendrick1
  1. 1University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  2. 2University of Southampton and Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry, Hampshire Partnership NHS Trust, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr E King
 Treatment Decisions Group, Community Clinical Sciences Research Division, University Department, Department of Psychiatry, RSH Hospital, Southampton, SO14 0YG, UK; E.A.Kingsoton.ac.uk

Abstract

Aim: To explore the feasibility of holding critical incident reviews (CIRs) after patient suicides in general practice and their ability to change practice.

Methods: Thirteen practices were invited to conduct a facilitated CIR on 18 current patient suicides. Next of kin views were sought. All staff attending a CIR were interviewed after the review.

Results: Ten practices reviewed 12 deaths. Twenty six staff attended reviews; all were interviewed. Next of kin contributed to six reviews; only one criticised care. Changes following the reviews included steps to improve internal communication and bereavement support to set up internal CIRs and review prescribing policies. Communications between practices and other agencies were clarified.

Conclusion: Practices were willing to hold CIRs and appreciated the potential positive value but need reassurance that they will not be blamed for suicides, and that the cost in time and resources will be recognised.

  • suicide
  • critical incident review
  • general practice
  • quality improvement

https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.007344

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • This study was sponsored by HOPE (formerly Wessex Medical Trust).

    • There are no competing interests.

    Linked Articles

    • Quality lines
      Quality Lines
      BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
      BMJ Quality & Safety 2005; 14 1-1 Published Online First: 03 Feb 2005.