Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Shared care arrangements for specialist drugs in the UK: the challenges facing GP adherence
Free
  1. Sarah Crowe1,
  2. Judith A Cantrill2,
  3. Mary P Tully2
  1. 1School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sarah Crowe, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; sarah.crowe{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To explore the challenges facing GPs' adherence to shared care arrangements for specialist drugs.

Design A qualitative study using semistructured interviews; data analysed using the ‘framework’ approach aided by QSR N-Vivo 2.0.

Setting Three Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) within one Strategic Health Authority (SHA) in the North West of England.

Participants 47 semistructured interviews were conducted with a range of Practice, PCT and SHA staff and other relevant stakeholders.

Results GPs faced multiple challenges in adhering to shared care arrangements for specialist drugs. Psychiatric patients were given as an example where such arrangements were perceived as particularly difficult to maintain, with patient non-compliance a contributory factor. GP uncertainty and confusion surrounded the sharing of test results between primary and secondary care, and was felt to give rise to test duplication and omission. Of particular concern to GPs was the lack of compliance of practice and hospital colleagues with these arrangements, and the dependence they placed on specialists' responses to requests for advice.

Conclusion This study provides evidence of the numerous challenges facing GP adherence to shared care arrangements. Such challenges need to be overcome if the issues of test duplication and omission are to be addressed, and GPs' future acceptance of shared care arrangements encouraged.

  • General practitioner
  • prescribing
  • primary care
  • shared care
  • specialist drugs
  • qualitative research
  • general practice
  • shared decision making

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding This study was funded by the University of Manchester as part of a PhD programme.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the North Manchester Research Ethics Committee (Ref no 04/Q1406/99).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.