Article Text

Download PDFPDF

System-wide learning from root cause analysis: a report from the New South Wales Root Cause Analysis Review Committee
Free
  1. Jonny Taitz1,
  2. Kelvin Genn2,
  3. Vanessa Brooks2,
  4. Deborah Ross2,
  5. Kathleen Ryan2,
  6. Bronwyn Shumack1,
  7. Tony Burrell1,
  8. Peter Kennedy1
  9. on behalf of the NSW RCA Review Committee
  1. 1Clinical Excellence Commission, Martin Place, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2Quality and Safety Branch, NSW Department of Health, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jonny Taitz, Level 3 Executive Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Sydney 2031, Australia; jonny.taitz{at}sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au

Abstract

Background Preventable errors are common in healthcare. Over the last decade, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) has become a key tool for healthcare services to investigate adverse events and try to prevent them from happening again. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the work of the New South Wales (NSW) RCA Review Committee. The benefits of correctly classifying, aggregating and disseminating RCA data to clinicians will be discussed. In NSW, we perform an average of 500 RCAs per year. It is estimated that each RCA takes between 20 and 90 h to perform. In 2007, the NSW Clinical Excellence Commission (CEC) and the Quality and Safety Branch at the Department of Health constituted an RCA review committee. 445 RCAs were reviewed by the committee in 14 months. 41 RCAs were related to errors in managing acute coronary syndrome.

Results and discussion The large number of RCAs has enabled the committee to identify emerging themes and to aggregate the information about underlying human (staff), patient and system factors. The committee has developed a taxonomy based on previous work done within health and aviation and assesses each RCA against this set of criteria. The effectiveness of recommendations made by RCA teams requires further review. There has been conjecture that staff do not feel empowered to articulate root causes which are beyond the capacity of the local service to address.

Conclusion Given the number of hours per RCA, it seems a shame that the final output of the process may not in fact achieve the desired patient safety improvements.

  • Communication
  • incident reporting
  • adverse event

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.