rss
Qual Health Care 10:4-9 doi:10.1136/qhc.10.1.4
  • Paper

Improving the quality of surgeons' treatment decisions: a comparison of clinical decision making with a computerised evidence based decision analytical model

Table 4

Mean risk estimates of operative mortality for patients who died (6.1%) and those who survived based on the 121 cases constructed with real patient data

Model Surgeon 1 Surgeon 2 Surgeon 3 Surgeon 4 All 4 surgeons
**Significant differences between the categories `patients died' and `patient survived' for the model: t (119) = 3.29, p<0.001 and for surgeon 1 t (116) = 5.1, p<0.001, surgeon 2 t (119) = 2.38, p<0.05, surgeon 3 t (118) = 5.83, p<0.001, and surgeon 4 t (119) = 2.78, p<0.01.
Patients died 17.8** 9.3** 8.2** 10.0** 19.5** 11.8
Patients survived 4.9** 6.4** 6.3** 5.8** 8.8** 6.8
All patients 5.6 6.6 6.4 6.0 9.3 7.1

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.