rss

Receive tables of contents (and more) by e-mail each issue:
Subscribe to Customised @lerts

September 2001, Volume 10, suppl 1

Engaging Patients in Decisions: A challenge to health care delivery and public health

[Author index]

Cover
  1. Editorial
  2. Introductory paper
  3. I. Communicating and understanding risk
  4. II. Patients' and clinicians' preference
  5. II. Patients'and clinicians' preference
[Search ALL Issues]

View multiple abstracts by picking relevant boxes and click Get all checked abstracts

Editorial

  • Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health

    • Richard Thomson,
    • Ann Bowling,
    • Fiona Moss
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i1 Published Online First: 1 September 2001 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100001..

Introductory paper

  • Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk

    • A Bowling,
    • S Ebrahim
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i2-i8 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100002..

I. Communicating and understanding risk

  • Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences

    • A Edwards,
    • G Elwyn
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i9-i13 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100009..

  • The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments

    • A J Lloyd
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i14-i18 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100014..

  • Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper

    • N Dudley
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i19-i22 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100019..

  • Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk

    • C Kennelly,
    • A Bowling
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i23-i28 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100023..

  • Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?

    • L Doyal
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i29-i33 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100029..

II. Patients' and clinicians' preference

  • Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools

    • A Robinson,
    • R Thomson
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i34-i38 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100034..

  • Differences in belief about likely outcomes account for differences in doctors' treatment preferences: but what accounts for the differences in belief?

    • T Rakow
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i44-i49 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100044..

  • Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences

    • M Ryan,
    • A Bate,
    • C J Eastmond,
    • A Ludbrook
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i55-i60 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100055..

  • Preferences and understanding their effects on health

    • K McPherson,
    • A Britton
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i61-i66 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100061..

II. Patients'and clinicians' preference

  • How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

    • A A Montgomery,
    • T Fahey
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i39-i43 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100039..

  • Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies

    • L J Frewer,
    • B Salter,
    • N Lambert
    Qual Health Care 2001;10:suppl 1 i50-i54 doi:10.1136/qhc.0100050..

View multiple abstracts by picking relevant boxes and click Get all checked abstracts

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.