Article Text

PDF

Patient safety: research methods for a new field
  1. J B Battles
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr J B Battles
 Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; jbattles{at}ahrq.gov

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Patient safety has emerged as a significant public health issue at the beginning of the 21st century. In the few years since the release of the Institute of Medicine’s report “To Err is Human1 in the United States and “An Organization with a Memory2 in the UK, major research activities have been launched to address issues of patient safety, medical error, and patient injury or harm. This fury of interest in patient safety has raised the question of just what are the appropriate research methods for this new field? Can issues of patient safety be addressed with traditional research methods associated with health services research? Are new methods and approaches required? If new methods and approaches are required, what are they and how can they be applied to patient safety issues and concerns?

This special supplemental issue of Quality and Safety in Health Care begins to answer some of these questions by presenting a series of articles that describe research methods and approaches to identify risks and hazards related to patient safety. Most of the papers were initially prepared for the first United States/United Kingdom Patient Safety Research Methodology Workshop. This workshop was jointly sponsored by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Patient Safety Research Programme of the UK Department of Health held in September 2002 in Reykjavik, Iceland. The workshop sought to bring together 25 of the researchers at the leading edge of investigation relevant to the improvement of safety in both the US and the UK. So that the material heard by attendees at the workshop can be available to a wider audience, the authors have translated workshop discussion papers into articles for this supplement.

Battles and Lilford provide an overview and conceptual framework for patient safety research. The next group of articles by Lilford, Zhan, and Rozich focus on the use of existing patient records and discharge information to identify risk and hazards. The articles by Kaplan, Tsatsoulis, Johnson, and Henriksen all consider issues related to event reporting systems, while both Carthey and Mackenzie examine approaches for direct observation to detect risks and hazards. Marx introduces the concept of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) as a proactive method of risk identification, and Nieva explores the measurement of organizational culture within the framework of identification of risks and hazards.

It is hoped that this collection of articles on research methods will be helpful to the readers of QSHC who are planning to conduct patient safety research, as well as to those who must evaluate such research in considering adoption of interventions aimed at eliminating the risks and hazards associated with patient safety.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.