rss

See original article: Müller et al. 13 (6): 444.

Update to Müller et al. 13 (6): 444
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:72
  • Correction

CORRECTIONS

In the quality improvement report by Muller et al (

; reprinted in QSHC 2004;13:444–449) a misunderstanding during editing led to an error in reporting the authors’ methods. In the third paragraph of the section “Strategy for change”, the correct text should read, “We provided [not obtained] feedback twice during routine staff meetings” and “We presented [not determined] the proportion of patients who had received allogenic or autologous blood transfusion after total joint replacement”. Technology led to a further slip, this time at proof stage. At the end of the fourth paragraph of the section “Effects of change”, a confusion caused by “track changes” resulted in the misrepresentation of an increase in units of transfused blood. The correct increase in units of transfused blood in Zurich should be from 52 700 to 60 600 (+15%) [not plus/minus 15%].

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BMJ Quality & Safety. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.