Article Text

PDF
Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy
  1. S Kenyon1,
  2. M Dixon-Woods2,
  3. C J Jackson2,
  4. K Windridge3,
  5. E Pitchforth2
  1. 1Reproductive Sciences Section, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, UK
  2. 2Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK
  3. 3Trent RDSU, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr M Dixon-Woods
 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK; md11{at}le.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials of interventions in critical situations are necessary to establish safety and evaluate outcomes. Pregnant women have been identified as a potentially vulnerable population.

Objective: To explore women’s experiences of being recruited to ORACLE, a randomised controlled trial of antibiotics in pre-term labour.

Methods: Twenty qualitative interviews were conducted with women who had participated in ORACLE. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method.

Results: Women gave prominence to the socioemotional aspects of their interactions with healthcare professionals in making decisions on trial participation. Comments on the quality of written and spoken information were generally favourable, but women’s accounts suggest that the stressful nature of the situation affected their ability to absorb the information. Women generally had poor understanding of trial design and practices. The main motivation for trial participation was the possibility of an improved outcome for the baby. The second and less prominent motivation was the opportunity to help others, but this was conditional on there being no risks associated with trial participation. In judging the risks of participation, women seemed to draw on “common sense” understandings including a perception that antibiotics were risk free.

Discussion: Recruitment to trials in critical situations raises important questions. Future studies should explore how rigorous governance arrangements for trials, particularly in critical situations, can protect participants rather than relying on ideals of informed consent that may be impossible to achieve. Future research should include a focus on interactions between research candidates and professionals involved in recruitment.

  • randomised controlled trials
  • pregnancy
  • critical situations
  • research governance
  • patients’ views

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The ORACLE trials and this project were supported by a strategic project grant from the UK Medical Research Council (ISCRTN 52995660).

  • Conflict of interest: Sara Kenyon was an investigator on the ORACLE trial.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.