Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia
Free
  1. Glyn Elwyn1,
  2. Diane Owen4,
  3. Llinos Roberts1,
  4. Kathie Wareham2,
  5. Paul Duane2,
  6. Miles Allison3,
  7. Alan Sykes4
  1. 1Department of General Practice, Centre for Health Sciences Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2Morriston Hospital, Swansea NHS Trust, Swansea, UK
  3. 3Department of Adult Medicine, Royal Gwent Hospital, Gwent Hospital Trust, Newport, UK
  4. 4Primary Care Group, Grove Building, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor G Elwyn
 Department of General Practice, Centre for Health Sciences Research, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK; elwyng{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Abstract

Problem: Rising demand and increasing waiting times for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (gastroscopy).

Design: Quality improvement study with pre- and post-intervention data collection.

Setting: Three endoscopy units in two hospital trusts (Singleton, Morriston and Baglan Hospitals endoscopy units), UK.

Key measures for improvement: Number of gastroscopy requests from general practitioners (GPs) and hospital doctors; their adherence to dyspepsia referral guidelines and the referral-to-procedure interval for upper gastroscopy. Data collected for six months before and for five months after the intervention.

Strategy for change: Referrals were assessed against the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of dyspepsia by two part-time GPs and feedback sent to clinicians where requests did not adhere to the referrals criteria

Effects of change: Adherence to guideline criteria increased significantly among GPs after the intervention (from 55% to 75%). There was no similar effect for hospital doctors, although their adherence rate (70%) was at a higher level than that of GPs before the intervention. The number of gastroscopy referrals for dyspepsia declined after the intervention, particularly from hospital doctors where a drop of 31% was observed, from 26.6 to 18.4 referrals per week. With the inclusion of seasonal effects, an estimated drop of 3.2 referrals per week from general practice was not significant (p = 0.065) while an estimated drop of 10.0 referrals per week for hospital doctors was very significant (p<0.001).

Lessons learnt: Referral assessment can be successfully introduced and shows promise as a way of improving the quality of referrals and reducing demand. Hospital clinicians are more resistant than GPs to referral assessment but nevertheless responded to the feedback by reducing their endoscopy gastroscopy requests. Most such referrals are generated in hospitals rather than in primary care: this finding has important implications for demand management.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: National Leadership and Innovation Agency for Healthcare, Welsh Assembly Government.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Ethics approval: The Bridgend, Neath Port Talbot and Swansea Local Research Ethics Committee approved the study (reference 04/WMW02/4).

    Contributors: GE proposed and designed the study, obtained the funding, acted as principal investigator and wrote the article. KW and CD (Clinical Research Unit) managed the data collection and managed the project. DO and LR undertook the referral assessment. MA and PD prepared the all-Wales guidelines and provided specialist gastroenterological advice. AS undertook the statistical analysis. All the authors contributed to the drafting and editing of the final paper. GE is the guarantor.