Article Text

PDF
Making use of mortality data to improve quality and safety in general practice: a review of current approaches
  1. Richard Baker1,
  2. Emma Sullivan1,
  3. Janette Camosso-Stefinovic1,
  4. Aly Rashid2,
  5. Azhar Farooqi3,
  6. Hanna Blackledge4,
  7. Justin Allen7
  1. 1Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK
  2. 2De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
  3. 3East Leicester Medical Practice, Leicester, UK
  4. 4Leicestershire and Rutland Health Informatics Service, Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland Strategic Health Authority, Leicester, UK
  5. 5Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland Postgraduate Deanery
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor R Baker
 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester, LE1 6TP, UK; rb14{at}le.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: To review studies of the use of mortality data in quality and safety improvement in general practice.

Design: Narrative review.

Methods: Search of Medline, Embase and CINAHL for articles reporting mortality monitoring or mortality reviews in general practice. The included articles were reported in English and of any study design, excluding case reports and comment pieces. Studies of palliative care and bereavement, and of primary care programmes in developing countries, were excluded.

Results: 229 articles were identified in the searches, 65 were identified as potentially relevant and 53 were included in the review. The studies addressed the impact of primary care provision on mortality rates, methods of monitoring mortality, and the role of audit and death registers in quality and safety improvement. General practitioners were interested in using mortality data but reported difficulties in obtaining complete information. There were no experimental studies of the impact of the use of mortality data, and little evidence of long-term systematic initiatives to use mortality data in quality and safety improvement in general practice.

Conclusions: Mortality data are not used systematically in general practice although general practitioners appear interested in the potential of this information in improving quality and safety. Improved systems to provide complete data are needed and experimental studies required to determine the effectiveness of use of the data to improve general practice care.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.