rss
Qual Saf Health Care 16:363-368 doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.019380
  • Original Article

Improving influenza immunisation for high-risk children and adolescents

  1. Maria T Britto1,
  2. Pamela J Schoettker2,
  3. Geralyn M Pandzik3,
  4. Jeanne Weiland3,
  5. Keith E Mandel2
  1. 1Division of Adolescent Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  2. 2Center for Health Policy and Clinical Effectiveness, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  3. 3Patient Services Administration, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Maria T Britto
 Division of Adolescent Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, USA; Maria.Britto{at}cchmc.org
  • Accepted 13 May 2007

Abstract

Objective: To improve influenza vaccination rates for high-risk children and adolescents.

Methods: During the 2004–5 influenza season, 5 regional cystic fibrosis (CF) centres, 6 hospital clinics that participated in a similar initiative the previous year, 4 new hospital clinics, and 39 community-based paediatric practices implemented a multicomponent change package consisting of nine improvement strategies designed to increase immunisation of high-risk patients. Each site was encouraged to adopt and customise the improvement strategies to meet their specific culture and needs. The main outcome measure was the proportion of the target population immunised. Surveys sent to the community practices were summarised.

Results: The intervention targeted a total of 18 866 high-risk children and 9374 (49.7%) received the influenza vaccination. Community-based practices that actively participated in the collaborative reported using significantly more intervention strategies (mean (SD) 7.4 (2.3) vs 4.6 (1.5), respectively, p = 0.001) and achieved higher immunisation rates (59.3% (13.6%) vs 43.7% (20.5%), respectively, p = 0.01) than non-participating practices. The most frequently implemented change concepts were posters in the office, walk-in clinics or same-day appointments and reminder phone calls. The interventions deemed most helpful were weekend or evening “flu shot only” sessions, walk-in or same-day appointments, reminder calls and special mailings to families.

Conclusions: Implementation of the change package, based on evidence and diffusion of innovation theory, resulted in higher immunisation rates than typically reported in the medical literature, especially for the community-based primary care practices.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This work was funded, in part, by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. These funding sources had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing of the report or decision to submit this paper for publication.

  • Competing interests: None.

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Email alerts

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

Navigate This Article