Article Text

PDF
An educational and audit tool to reduce prescribing error in intensive care
  1. A N Thomas,
  2. E M Boxall,
  3. S K Laha,
  4. A J Day,
  5. D Grundy
  1. Intensive Care Unit Hope Hospital, Salford, UK
  1. Dr A Thomas, Department of Intensive Care, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8DH, UK; tony.thomas{at}srft.nhs.uk

Abstract

Aim: To reduce prescribing errors in an intensive care unit by providing prescriber education in tutorials, ward-based teaching and feedback in 3-monthly cycles with each new group of trainee medical staff.

Methods: Prescribing audits were conducted three times in each 3-month cycle, once pretraining, once post-training and a final audit after 6 weeks. The audit information was fed back to prescribers with their correct prescribing rates, rates for individual error types and total error rates together with anonymised information about other prescribers’ error rates.

Results: The percentage of prescriptions with errors decreased over each 3-month cycle (pretraining 25%, 19%, (one missing data point), post-training 23%, 6%, 11%, final audit 7%, 3%, 5% (p<0.0005)). The total number of prescriptions and error rates varied widely between trainees (data collection one; cycle two: range of prescriptions written: 1–61, median 18; error rate: 0–100%; median: 15%).

Conclusion: Prescriber education and feedback reduce manual prescribing errors in intensive care.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.