Article Text

PDF
Medication errors: the impact of prescribing and transcribing errors on preventable harm in hospitalised patients
  1. J E van Doormaal1,
  2. P M L A van den Bemt2,3,
  3. P G M Mol4,
  4. R J Zaal5,
  5. A C G Egberts2,6,
  6. F M Haaijer-Ruskamp4,
  7. J G W Kosterink1
  1. 1
    Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  4. 4
    Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  5. 5
    Department of Clinical Pharmacy, TweeSteden Hospital and St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  6. 6
    Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  1. Ms J E van Doormaal, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Postbus 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; j.e.van.doormaal{at}apoth.umcg.nl

Abstract

Background: Medication errors (MEs) affect patient safety to a significant extent. Because these errors can lead to preventable adverse drug events (pADEs), it is important to know what type of ME is the most prevalent cause of these pADEs. This study determined the impact of the various types of prescribing (administrative, dosing and therapeutic) and transcribing errors on pADEs in hospitalised patients.

Methods: During a 5-month period, data for patients admitted to a total of five internal medicine wards of one university and one teaching hospital in The Netherlands were prospectively collected by chart review. In each hospital, MEs were detected and classified by the same pharmacist, using the classification scheme for MEs developed by The Netherlands Association of Hospital Pharmacists. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of pADEs during hospital stay. In consensus meetings, five pharmacists assessed the causal relationship between MEs and pADEs. The association between type of ME and pADEs was determined by a multivariate regression analysis taking into account potential confounders.

Results: The study included 592 hospital admissions with 7286 medication orders (MOs), of which 60% contained at least one prescribing or transcribing error. 1.4% of all MOs led to pADEs, concerning 14.8% of all admitted patients. The total number of pADEs was 103, and in 92 of these cases patients experienced temporary harm, in eight cases hospital admission was prolongued, two cases were life-threatening, and one was fatal. Therapeutic errors were most strongly associated with pADEs (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.53 to 2.56).

Conclusions: Although many prescribing and transcribing errors occur in the process of medication use of hospitalised patients, a minority lead to pADEs. In particular, therapeutic errors are the cause of these pADEs and are therefore clinically relevant. Intervention and prevention programmes should primarily focus on this type of medication error.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was supported by an unconditional grant of The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.