rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:402-407 doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.024513
  • Original research

Medication reconciliation in ambulatory care: attempts at improvement

  1. C L Nassaralla1,
  2. J M Naessens2,
  3. V L Hunt1,
  4. A Bhagra1,
  5. R Chaudhry1,
  6. M A Hansen1,
  7. S M Tulledge-Scheitel1
  1. 1
    Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2
    Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; tulledgescheitel.sidna{at}mayo.edu
  • Accepted 17 August 2008

Abstract

Objective: To enhance overall accuracy of medication lists by providing performance feedback and training to the healthcare team and increasing patient participation in the medication reconciliation process.

Methods: This prospective study involved patients seen in four academic, ambulatory primary care internal medicine clinics. Before the interventions, baseline data were analysed, assessing completeness, correctness and accuracy of medication documentation in the electronic medical record. Interventions to provide performance feedback and training to the healthcare team, increase patient awareness and participation in the medication reconciliation process were implemented. Immediately after each intervention, a data collection was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on the accuracy of individual medications and medication lists.

Results: Completeness of medication lists improved from 20.4% to 50.4% (p<0.001). The incomplete documentation of medication lists was mostly because of lack of frequency (15.4%) and route (8.9%) for individual medications within a medication list. Correctness of medication lists improved from 23.1% to 37.7% (p = 0.087). The incorrectness in a medication list was mostly because of incorrect medications dose. Patient participation in the medication reconciliation process increased from 13.9% to 33% (p<0.001). The medication list accuracy improved from 11.5% to 29% (p = 0.014).

Conclusion: In this setting, it was helpful to engage the active participation of all members of the healthcare team and most importantly the patient to improve the accuracy of medication lists.

Footnotes

  • Presented as a poster at the ISQua 2007, Boston, Massachusetts, 30 September 2007.

  • Funding Funding for this study came from a Mayo Foundation CPI-10 grant.

  • Competing interests None.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BMJ Quality & Safety. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.