rss
Qual Saf Health Care 18:456-461 doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023119
  • Original research

Do managed clinical networks improve quality of diabetes care? Evidence from a retrospective mixed methods evaluation

  1. A Greene1,
  2. C Pagliari2,
  3. S Cunningham3,
  4. P Donnan4,
  5. J Evans4,
  6. A Emslie-Smith5,
  7. A Morris6,
  8. B Guthrie4
  1. 1
    Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3
    Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  4. 4
    Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  5. 5
    Mill Practice, Arthurstone Medical Centre, Dundee, UK
  6. 6
    Department of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
  1. Correspondence to Alexandra Greene, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Forresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK; a.greene{at}abdn.ac.uk
  • Accepted 22 October 2008

Abstract

Problem: System-wide improvement of chronic disease care is challenging because it requires collaboration and communication across organisational and professional boundaries. Managed clinical networks are one potential solution, but there is little evidence of their effectiveness.

Design and setting: Retrospective, mixed-methods evaluation of the form and impact of quality improvement in the Tayside Diabetes Managed Clinical Network (MCN) 1998–2005.

Strategies for change: Progressive implementation of multiple quality improvement strategies predominately directed at individuals and clinical teams (guideline development and dissemination, education, clinical audit, encouragement of multidisciplinary team working, task redesign). Information technology played an important role in supporting QI activity, but participants identified it as facilitative rather than delivering QI by itself. More important was achieving widespread clinical engagement through persuasion and appeal to shared professional values by clinical leaders.

Effects of change: Simple process measures such as glycated haemoglobin measurement rapidly improved. More complex process measures such as eye screening improved more slowly, and were more dependent on redesign of the care pathway. Improvement was greater for type 2 than type 1 diabetes. Significant shifts of care for type 2 diabetes into primary care were achieved, but were harder to achieve without additional resources.

Lessons learnt: Delivering better care to whole populations across organisational and professional boundaries required sustained work over long periods, and at all levels of the system of care. Past network focus on clinical collaboration has been effective at improving clinical process and outcome, and the network is now prioritising work with managers and patients to support future redesign.

Footnotes

  • ▸ Additional figures and tables are published online only at http://qshc.bmj.com/content/vol18/issue6

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Email alerts

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

Navigate This Article