rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:i38-i43 doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029389
  • Supplement

Differentiating between hospitals according to the “maturity” of quality improvement systems: a new classification scheme in a sample of European hospitals

This article has been UnlockedFree via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS
  1. M J M H Lombarts1,
  2. I Rupp1,
  3. P Vallejo2,
  4. N S Klazinga1,
  5. R Suñol2
  1. 1
    Academic Medical Center, Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  2. 2
    Avedis Donabedian Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  1. Dr M J M H (Kiki) Lombarts, Academic Medical Center, Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands; M.J.Lombarts{at}amc.uva.nl
  • Accepted 23 November 2008

Abstract

Aim: This study, part of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) research project focusing on cross-border patients in Europe, investigated quality policies and improvement in healthcare systems across the European Union (EU). The aim was to develop a classification scheme for the level of quality improvement (maturity) in EU hospitals, in order to evaluate hospitals according to the maturity of their quality improvement activities.

Methods: A web-based questionnaire survey designed to measure quality improvement in EU hospitals was used as the basis for the classification scheme. Items included for the development of an evaluation tool—the maturity index—were considered important contributors to quality improvement. The four-stage quality cycle (plan, do, check and act) was used to determine the level of maturity of the various items. Psychometric properties of the classification scheme were assessed, and validation analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 389 hospitals participated in a questionnaire survey; response rates varied by country. For a final sample of 349 hospitals, it was possible to construct a quality improvement maturity index which consisted of seven domains and 113 items. The results of independent analyses sustained the validity of the index, which was useful in differentiating between hospitals in the research sample according to the maturity of their quality improvement system (defined as the total of all quality improvement activities).

Discussion: Further research is recommended to develop an instrument which for use in the future as a practical tool to evaluate the maturity of hospital quality improvement systems.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Research done for the “Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS)” project (SP21-CT-2004-513712) was funded by the European Commission through its Scientific Support to Policies action under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research.

  • Competing interests: None.

This article has been Unlocked
Free via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BMJ Quality & Safety. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.