rss
Qual Saf Health Care 18:i38-i43 doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029389
  • Supplement

Differentiating between hospitals according to the “maturity” of quality improvement systems: a new classification scheme in a sample of European hospitals

Table 6 Agreement between quality improvement (QI) maturity index classification and assessments of independent surveyors*
Evaluator scale Least mature n (%) Most mature n (%)
Least developed QI 11 (84.6) 2 (15.4)
18 (85.7) 3 (14.3)
Intermediate 13 (46.4) 15 (53.6)
10 (25.0) 30 (75.0)
Most developed QI 0 6 (100)
Total 52 (48.1) 56 (51.9)
  • *In general, two surveyors audited each hospital. Their responses were included independently in the analysis (either both gave the same response, or each gave a different one). Some hospitals were audited by only one surveyor, and not all of them provided a maturity rating.

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.