rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:i57-i61 doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029413
  • Supplement

Implementation of patient safety strategies in European hospitals

This article has been UnlockedFree via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS
  1. R Suñol1,
  2. P Vallejo1,
  3. O Groene1,
  4. G Escaramis2,
  5. A Thompson3,
  6. B Kutryba4,
  7. P Garel5
  1. 1
    Avedis Donabedian Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2
    Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Barcelona, and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3
    School of Social and Political Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
  4. 4
    National Centre for Quality Assessment in Health Care (NCQA), Krakow, Poland
  5. 5
    European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE), Brussels, Belgium
  1. R Suñol, Avedis Donabedian Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Provenza 293 Pral, Barcelona 08037, Spain; fad{at}fadq.org
  • Accepted 26 November 2008

Abstract

Context: This study is part of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) research project on cross-border care, investigating quality improvement strategies in healthcare systems across the European Union (EU).

Aim: To explore to what extent a sample of acute care European hospitals have implemented patient safety strategies and mechanisms and whether the implementation is related to the type of hospital.

Methods: Data were collected on patient safety structures and mechanisms in 389 acute care hospitals in eight EU countries using a web-based questionnaire. Subsequently, an on-site audit was carried out by independent surveyors in 89 of these hospitals to assess patient safety outputs. This paper presents univariate and bivariate statistics on the implementation and explores the associations between implementation of patient safety strategies and hospital type using the χ2 test and Fisher exact test.

Results: Structures and plans for safety (including responsibilities regarding patient safety management) are well developed in most of the hospitals that participated in this study. The study found greater variation regarding the implementation of mechanisms or activities to promote patient safety, such as electronic drug prescription systems, guidelines for prevention of wrong patient, wrong site and wrong surgical procedure, and adverse events reporting systems. In the sample of hospitals that underwent audit, a considerable proportion do not comply with basic patient safety strategies—for example, using bracelets for adult patient identification and correct labelling of medication.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This research was funded by the European Commission through its “Scientific Support to Policies” action under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research for the research project “Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS)” (SP21-CT-2004-513712).

  • Competing interests: None.

This article has been Unlocked
Free via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BMJ Quality & Safety. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.