rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:i69-i74 doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029447
  • Supplement

Learning from MARQuIS: future direction of quality and safety in hospital care in the European Union

This article has been UnlockedFree via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS
  1. O Groene1,
  2. N Klazinga2,
  3. K Walshe3,
  4. C Cucic4,
  5. C D Shaw5,
  6. R Suñol1
  1. 1
    Avedis Donabedian University Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain, and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)
  2. 2
    Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Social Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  3. 3
    Herbert Simon Institute for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, Manchester, UK
  4. 4
    The Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement, the Netherlands
  5. 5
    European Society for Quality in Health Care, Limerick, Ireland
  1. O Groene, Avedis Donabedian University Institute, UAB, Provenza 293 Pral, 08037 Barcelona, Spain; ogroene{at}fadq.org

    Abstract

    This article summarises the significant lessons to be drawn from, and the policy implications of, the findings of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) project—a part of the suite of research projects intended to support policy established by the European Commission through its Sixth Framework Programme. The article first reviews the findings of MARQuIS and their implications for healthcare providers (and particularly for hospitals), and then addresses the broader policy implications for member states of the European Union (EU) and for the commission itself. Against the background of the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme, it then outlines a number of future areas for research to inform policy and practice in quality and safety in Europe. The article concludes that at this stage, a unique EU-wide quality improvement system for hospitals does not seem to be feasible or effective. Because of possible future community action in this field, attention should focus on the use of existing research on quality and safety strategies in healthcare, with the aim of combining soft measures to accelerate mutual learning. Concrete measures should be considered only in areas for which there is substantial evidence and effective implementation can be ensured.

    Footnotes

    • Funding: This research was funded by the European Commission through its “Scientific Support to Policies” action under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research for the research project “Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS)” (SP21-CT-2004-513712).

    • Competing interests: None.

    This article has been Unlocked
    Free via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for BMJ Quality & Safety. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.