Article Text

PDF

Clinical simulation in maternity (CSiM): interprofessional learning through simulation team training
  1. Lyn Gum,
  2. Jennene Greenhill,
  3. Kerry Dix
  1. Flinders University Rural Clinical School, Renmark, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Lyn Gum, PO Box 852, Renmark 5341, Australia; lyn.gum{at}flinders.edu.au

Abstract

Background Focusing on interprofessional relations in team performance to improve patient safety is an emerging priority in obstetrics. A review of the literature found little information on roles and teamwork in obstetric emergency training. Qualitative research was undertaken through a Clinical Simulation in Maternity programme which gives interprofessional rural clinicians the opportunity to learn collaboratively through simulated obstetric emergencies. This research aimed to determine how interprofessional simulation team training improved maternity emergency care and team performance.

Method This research used thematic inductive analysis using data from in-depth interviews. In total 17 participants and four facilitators who took part in the Clinical Simulation in Maternity workshops were invited to participate in an interview 1–2 weeks postworkshop and then again 3–6 months later. Data were deidentified then coded manually and with the assistance of computer program NVivo 7 (QSR International).

Findings Of the major themes identified, Collaboration in Teambuilding was separated into four subthemes (Personal Role Awareness, Interpositional Knowledge, Mutuality and Leadership).

Conclusion This research highlights the significance of interprofessional training, particularly through simulation learning in a team where rural clinicians are able to learn more about each other and gain role clarity, leadership skills and mutuality in a safe environment.

  • Patient simulation
  • interprofessional relations
  • obstetrics
  • teamwork
  • qualitative research
  • team roles
  • leadership
  • attitudes

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This research was supported by the Flinders University Faculty of Health Sciences, GPO Box 2100 Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Flinders University Adelaide Australia.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.