Article Text

PDF
The clinical governance development index: results from a New Zealand study
  1. Robin Gauld1,
  2. Simon Horsburgh1,
  3. Jeff Brown2
  1. 1Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, MidCentral District Health Board, Palmerston North, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robin Gauld, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; robin.gauld{at}otago.ac.nz

Abstract

Background Clinical governance is seen as pivotal to improving healthcare quality, yet there are few available tools for tracking progress on its implementation. With this in mind, the authors developed a Clinical Governance Development Index (CGDI) designed to track performances between healthcare organisations and over time.

Methods A survey on implementation of government policy on clinical governance was sent to 3402 New Zealand public hospital specialists. Responses to seven survey items were weighted and combined to form the CGDI. Final scores for each of New Zealand's 21 District Health Boards were converted to percentages.

Results The mean CGDI score was 47.3%, with significant differences in performances across the 21 District Health Boards (F(20, 1178)=3.233, p=0.0000). Scores were higher in boards where respondents perceived governing boards and management worked to support clinical leadership.

Conclusion The CGDI offers a simple method for measuring the extent to which a healthcare organisation is working to develop clinical governance. Its use in New Zealand provides a baseline for tracking clinical governance over time. The CGDI could be easily adapted for use in other healthcare systems.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding University of Otago; Association of Salaried Medical Specialists.

  • Competing interests JB is President, Association of Salaried Medical Specialists and Chaired the Ministerial Task Group on Clinical Leadership.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the National Executive of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.