Article Text

PDF

Funnel plots for comparing provider performance based on patient-reported outcome measures
  1. Jenny Neuburger1,2,
  2. David A Cromwell1,2,
  3. Andrew Hutchings1,2,
  4. Nick Black1,
  5. Jan H van der Meulen1,2
  1. 1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jenny Neuburger, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15–17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK; jenny.neuburger{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) often produce skewed distributions of individual scores after a healthcare intervention. For health performance indicators derived from skewed distributions, funnel plots designed with symmetric control limits may increase the risk of false alarms about poor performance.

Aim To investigate the accuracy of funnel plots with symmetric control limits when comparing provider performance based on PROMs.

Methods The authors used a database containing condition-specific PROMs for 17 453 hip replacements and 7656 varicose vein procedures performed by providers in the English NHS. The mean postoperative PROM score, adjusted for patient characteristics, was used as the measure of performance. To compare performance, symmetric 99.8% control limits were calculated on funnel plots, 3 SDs away from the overall mean on either side. These were compared to control limits derived directly from percentiles of simulated (bootstrap) distributions of mean scores.

Results The simulated control limits on funnel plots for both procedures were asymmetric. The empirical probability of falling outside the symmetric 99.8% ‘poor performance’ control limit was inflated from the stipulated rate of 0.1% to 0.2–0.3% for provider sample sizes of up to 150 procedures. The authors observed that, out of 237 providers of hip replacement, eight had adjusted mean scores that exceeded the symmetric ‘poor performance’ limit compared with only five that exceeded the corresponding simulated limit. In other words, three (1.3%) were differently classified. For varicose vein surgery, five out of 160 providers exceeded the symmetric limit and four exceeded the simulated limit, that is, 1 (0.6%) was differently classified.

Conclusions When designing funnel plots for comparisons of provider performance based on highly skewed data, the use of simulated control limits should be considered.

  • Patient outcomes
  • funnel plots
  • healthcare quality
  • surgery
  • statistical process control
  • statistics
  • performance measures
  • clinical practice guidelines

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This work is funded by the DH Directorate of System Management and New Enterprise.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.