rss
BMJ Qual Saf 21:i89-i96 doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001171
  • Original research

The key actor: a qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe

Open Access
  1. 1Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Social Work, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  4. 4Department on Quality and Safety, St Antonius Hospital, and Department on Quality and Safety, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Primary Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  6. 6Kalorama Foundation, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  7. 7National Center for Quality Assessment in Health Care, Krakow, Poland
  8. 8Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
  9. 9Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety Centre, Tuscany Region, Florence, FI, Italy
  10. 10Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  11. 11Primary Health Care, Utrecht Area, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  12. 12Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  13. 13Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  14. 14Quality and Patient Safety, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  15. 15Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  16. 16Patient Safety Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  17. 17Department of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Maria Flink, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, B44, Karolinska Sjukhuset Huddinge, Stockholm 14186, Sweden; maria.flink{at}ki.se
  • Accepted 25 August 2012
  • Published Online First 30 October 2012

Abstract

Background Patient safety experts have postulated that increasing patient participation in communications during patient handovers will improve the quality of patient transitions, and that this may reduce hospital readmissions. Choosing strategies that enhance patient safety through improved handovers requires better understanding of patient experiences and preferences for participation.

Objective The aim of this paper is to explore the patients’ experiences and perspectives related to the handovers between their primary care providers and the inpatient hospital.

Methods A qualitative secondary analysis was performed, based on individual and focus group patient interviews with 90 patients in five European countries.

Results The analysis revealed three themes: patient positioning in the handover process; prerequisites for patient participation and patient preferences for the handover process. Patients’ participation ranged from being the key actor, to sharing the responsibility with healthcare professional(s), to being passive participants. For active participation patients required both personal and social resources as well as prerequisites such as information and respect. Some patients preferred to be the key actor in charge; others preferred their healthcare professionals to be the key actors in the handover.

Conclusions Patients’ participation is related to the healthcare system, the activity of healthcare professionals’ and patients’ capacity for participation. Patients prefer a handover process where the responsibility is clear and unambiguous. Healthcare organisations need a clear and well-considered system of responsibility for handover processes, that takes into account the individual patient's need of clarity, and support in relation to his/hers own recourses.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode

Open Access

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Email alerts

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.