rss
Qual Health Care 9:166-174 doi:10.1136/qhc.9.3.166
  • Papers

Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study

Table 2

Characteristics of respondents interviewed and practices within primary care group (PCG)

Respondents interviewed (n=52) Lead general practitioner (n=15) Non-lead general practitioner (n=14) Practice nurse (n=12) Practice manager (n=11)
Sex
 Male 12 9 0 1
 Female 3 5 12 10
Age range
 30–39 5 3 2 0
 40–49 6 7 7 4
 50–59 4 3 3 7
 60+ 0 1 0 0
Years in general practice 13.8 (SD 8.2) 14.9 (SD 10.5) 10.2 (SD 4.6) (data not collected)
Qualifications (data not collected) (data not collected)
 FRCGP 1 0
 MRCGP 6 7
 DCH 3 2
 DRCOG 6 7
PCG characteristics of the 18 practices Participating practices (n=15) Non-participating practices (n=3)
List size of each practice
 <3000 2 1
 3000–<6000 3 2
 6000–<9000 5
 9000–<12 000 2
 12 000+ 3
No of GP partners
 Single handed 2 1
 2 partners 0 1
 3 partners 5
 4 partners 2 1
 5 partners 1
 6 partners 3
 7 partners 2
Setting
 Urban 11 3
 Semi-rural 4 0
Level of computerisation
 No computer
 Computerised repeat prescribing and limited use of Read codes 5 2
 Fully computerised repeat prescribing and some diagnoses Read coded 2 1
 Fully computerised repeat prescribing and most diagnoses Read coded 8
 Fully computerised repeat prescribing and all diagnoses Read coded 0 0

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.