rss
Qual Saf Health Care doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.028811
  • Original research

Quantifying variation of paediatric length of stay among intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand

  1. Lahn Straney1,
  2. Archie Clements1,
  3. Jan Alexander2,
  4. Anthony Slater3
  1. 1School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Lahn Straney, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Level 2, Public Health Building, Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; l.straney{at}uq.edu.au
  • Accepted 27 January 2009
  • Published Online First 1 February 2010

Abstract

Objective To quantify variation of mean paediatric length of stay (LoS) among intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand.

Method Retrospective data from Australian and New Zealand institutions that admitted children to ICU were analysed. The data were collected between 1997 and 2006, providing a total of 123 institution years of data (an average of 6.15 years per site). Using 47 068 admissions, LoS was modelled as the outcome variable of a Γ regression with a child's risk factors entered as fixed effects (allowing adjustment for case mix) and variation among ICUs modelled using a random effect.

Results Six Australasian ICUs had an average risk-adjusted LoS for children, which was significantly shorter than average, whereas five had an average LoS that was significantly longer than average. The remaining nine sites had average LoS that were not significantly different from the average (at the 95% level). Among other risk factors, previous admission to an ICU and respiratory support within the first hour of admission were both associated with prolonged LoS.

Conclusion There was significant variation in paediatric LoS at the ICU level not accounted for by patient case-mix. This has important implications for efficiency of ICU processes and, possibly, other components of quality of patient care in those institutions with longer LoS.

Footnotes

  • Funding LS's PhD stipend is funded by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (Carlton, Victoria, Australia). The ANZPIC Registry is supported by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, the Ministry of Health (New Zealand), and State and Territory Health Departments through the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. qshc.2008.028811v1
    2. 19/6/1-l most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BMJ Quality & Safety. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.