Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Pharmacist- versus physician-acquired medication history: a prospective study at the emergency department
  1. Sabrina De Winter1,
  2. Isabel Spriet1,
  3. Christophe Indevuyst1,
  4. Peter Vanbrabant2,3,
  5. Didier Desruelles3,
  6. Marc Sabbe3,
  7. Jean Bernard Gillet3,
  8. Alexander Wilmer2,
  9. Ludo Willems1
  1. 1Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  2. 2Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  3. 3Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Miss Sabrina De Winter, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; sabrina.dewinter{at}uzleuven.be

Abstract

Background Recent literature revealed that medication histories obtained by physicians and nurses are often incomplete. However, the number of patients included was often low.

Study objective In this study, the authors compare medication histories obtained in the Emergency Department (ED) by pharmacists versus physicians and identify characteristics contributing to discrepancies.

Methods Medication histories were acquired by the pharmacist from patients admitted to the ED, planned to be hospitalised. A structured form was used to guide the pharmacist or technician to ensure a standardised approach. Discrepancies, defined as any difference between the pharmacist-acquired medication history and that obtained by the physician, were analysed.

Results 3594 medication histories were acquired by pharmacy staff. 59% (95% CI 58.2% to 59.8%) of medication histories recorded by physicians were different from those obtained by the pharmacy staff. Within these inaccurate medication histories, 5963 discrepancies were identified. The most common type of error was omission of a drug (61%; 95% CI 60.4% to 61.6%), followed by omission of dose (18%; 95% CI 17.6% to 18.4%). Drugs belonging to the class of psycholeptics, acid suppressors and beta blocking agents were related to the highest discrepancy rate. Acetylsalicylic acid, omeprazole and zolpidem were most commonly forgotten.

Conclusion This large prospective study demonstrates that medication history acquisition is very often incomplete in the ED. A structured form and a standardised method is necessary. Pharmacists are especially suited to acquire and supervise accurate medication histories, as they are educated and familiar with commonly used drugs.

  • Quality assurance
  • medication reconciliation
  • hospital pharmacy services
  • psycholeptics
  • beta blocking agents
  • drug therapy
  • emergency department
  • medication

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Commentary
    Edward Etchells
  • Quality lines
    David P Stevens