rss
BMJ Qual Saf doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2011.051482
  • Original research

The clinical governance development index: results from a New Zealand study

  1. Jeff Brown2
  1. 1Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, MidCentral District Health Board, Palmerston North, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robin Gauld, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; robin.gauld{at}otago.ac.nz
  • Accepted 11 May 2011
  • Published Online First 8 June 2011

Abstract

Background Clinical governance is seen as pivotal to improving healthcare quality, yet there are few available tools for tracking progress on its implementation. With this in mind, the authors developed a Clinical Governance Development Index (CGDI) designed to track performances between healthcare organisations and over time.

Methods A survey on implementation of government policy on clinical governance was sent to 3402 New Zealand public hospital specialists. Responses to seven survey items were weighted and combined to form the CGDI. Final scores for each of New Zealand's 21 District Health Boards were converted to percentages.

Results The mean CGDI score was 47.3%, with significant differences in performances across the 21 District Health Boards (F(20, 1178)=3.233, p=0.0000). Scores were higher in boards where respondents perceived governing boards and management worked to support clinical leadership.

Conclusion The CGDI offers a simple method for measuring the extent to which a healthcare organisation is working to develop clinical governance. Its use in New Zealand provides a baseline for tracking clinical governance over time. The CGDI could be easily adapted for use in other healthcare systems.

Footnotes

  • Funding University of Otago; Association of Salaried Medical Specialists.

  • Competing interests JB is President, Association of Salaried Medical Specialists and Chaired the Ministerial Task Group on Clinical Leadership.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the National Executive of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.