BMJ Qual Saf doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000916
  • Editorial

Poverty amid plenty

  1. Robert L Wears1,2
  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Florida, USA
  2. 2Clinical Safety Research Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robert L Wears, Department of Emergency Medicine, UF Health Science Center, University of Florida, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA; wears{at}

Clinical handoffs are tools aimed at bridging gaps1 that occur during transitions in care, whether across time (eg, shift changes) or across organisational boundaries (eg, the ward to the intensive care unit). They have long been viewed as potential threats to safety2 and are attracting increasing attention for several reasons. First, from a control theory point of view, handoffs are inherently hazardous because having two controllers in a process always raises the possibility of conflict, poor coordination or miscommunication.3 Second, handoffs are often cast among ‘the usual suspects’ in after-the-fact reviews of critical incidents and adverse events,4 5 although a few have noted that they have also been sources of recovery from impending danger.6–9 And finally, concerns about fatigue leading to a reduction in work hours present a potential double bind, as decreasing risks from fatigue might be counterbalanced by increasing risks from more frequent handoffs.

Perhaps …

Relevant Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Email alerts

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.


Navigate This Article