Article Text

Stakeholder perspectives on handovers between hospital staff and general practitioners: an evaluation through the microsystems lens
  1. Beryl Göbel1,
  2. Dorien Zwart2,
  3. Gijs Hesselink3,
  4. Loes Pijnenborg1,
  5. Paul Barach1,5,
  6. Cor Kalkman1,4,
  7. Julie K Johnson6
  1. 1Patient Safety Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of General Practice, Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  3. 3Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Norway
  6. 6Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dorien Zwart, Department of General Practice, Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands; D.Zwart{at}umcutrecht.nl

Abstract

Background Much of the research on improving patient handovers has focused on enhancing communication within the hospital system, but there have been relatively few efforts aimed at addressing the challenges at the interface between the hospital and the primary care setting.

Methods A qualitative thematic analysis using a clinical microsystems lens applied to 28 semi-structured key stakeholder interviews in the Netherlands. Data were organised into seven ‘virtual’ clinical microsystem datasets composed of patients, hospital-based physicians, hospital-based nurses and community-based general practitioners.

Results Five themes that contributed to effective or ineffective handovers emerged from our analysis: (1) lack of adequate information; (2) healthcare professionals’ availability and opportunity for personal contact; (3) feedback, teaching and protocols related to handovers; (4) information technology facilitated communication solutions; and (5) the role and responsibility of patients. Our analysis suggests that each healthcare professional attempted to provide the best care possible, but did this largely in isolation, and without the benefit of the knowledge and expertise of the other members of the microsystem.

Conclusions The microsystem approach offers an innovative organisational construct and approach to assess the gaps in ‘hospital to community’ patient handovers, by viewing the hospital to the community interface as a clinical microsystem continuum. Our application of the microsystem approach confirms and extends earlier findings about the impact of barriers on the continuity and safety of patient transitions and their impact on the quality of patient care.

  • Hand-off
  • General practice
  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Qualitative research
  • Patient safety

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: