Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Quality of care in systemic lupus erythematosus: the association between process and outcome measures in the Lupus Outcomes Study
  1. Jinoos Yazdany1,
  2. Laura Trupin1,
  3. Gabriela Schmajuk2,
  4. Patricia P Katz1,3,
  5. Edward H Yelin1,3
  1. 1Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  2. 2Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  3. 3Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jinoos Yazdany, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0920, San Francisco, CA 94143-0920, USA; jinoos.yazdany{at}ucsf.edu

Abstract

Objectives Although process measures to assess quality of care in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are available, their relationship to long-term outcomes has not been studied. Using a prospective, longitudinal cohort study, we examined the associations between high-quality care and two important SLE outcomes, disease activity and damage.

Methods Data were derived from the University of California, San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study. Participants were followed from 2009 through 2013, responding to yearly surveys. Primary outcomes in this study were clinically meaningful increases in disease activity and damage, assessed by the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) and the Brief Index of Lupus Damage (BILD), respectively. Using multivariable regression, we examined the relationship between high performance on 13 validated quality measures (receipt of ≥85% of quality measures), and disease outcomes, adjusting for disease status, sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare services and follow-up time.

Results The 737 participants were eligible for a mean of five quality measures (SD 2, range 2–12). There were 155 and 162 participants who had clinically meaningful increases in SLAQ and BILD, respectively. In our models, we found no statistically significant relationship between performance on quality measures and changes in SLAQ. However, receiving higher-quality SLE care was significantly protective against increased disease damage (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.7), even after adjusting for covariates.

Discussion In this community-based cohort, we illustrate for the first time a strong link between processes of care, defined by SLE quality measures, and the subsequent accumulation of disease damage, an important outcome.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.