Skip to main content
Log in

Validity and reliability of the confirmation of expectations paradigm as a determinant of consumer satisfaction

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Validity of the Confirmation of Expectations paradigm with respect to consumer satisfaction was examined on the basis of the intercorrelations between five variables of the satisfaction process i.e., Expectations, Postpurchase Evaluation, Confirmation of Expectations, Overall Satisfaction, and Repurchase. The results showed that the confirmation of expectations was a confounding variable in the satisfaction process. The major explanation for this variable not fitting into the process was the low reliability of the gain scores or difference scores (i.e., subtraction of prepurchase expectations from post-purchase evaluation) used for the computation of the confirmation of expectations. The major conclusions of this study were as follows: (1) If the purpose of the research is only to predict satisfaction or repurchase then it is best to depend upon direct measures such as postpurchase ratings. (2) If the purpose of research is diagnostic analysis then it is better to apply the confirmation of expectations concept. But for this later application it is important to develop reliable scales to measure the construct of confirmation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cronbach, Lee J., and Furby, L. 1970. “How We Should Measure ‘Change’ or Should We?”Psychological Bulletin 74 (July), 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J., Gleser, Goldine C., Nanda, Harinder and Rajaratnam Negeswari. 1972.The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalization for Scores and Profiles, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel, John A., and Rosenberg, Larry, J. 1976. “The Study of Consumer Satisfaction: Addressing the ‘So what’ Question,” in Keith Hunt (ed.)conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Engel, James F., andBlackwell, Roger D. 1982.Consumer Behavior, Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, Harry. 1959. “Adaptation Level Theory,” in Sigmund Koch (ed.),Psychology: A Study of Science, 1, New York: McGraw-Hill. Howard, John A., and Sheth, Jagdish N. 1969.The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, Thomas F. 1966. “Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probabilities; An Experiment in Survey Design,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61 (September), 658–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jae-An and Kahout, Frank J. 1975. “Special Topics in General Linear Models,” in Nie et al., (Ed.),Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, James C., and Pfaff, Martin. 1972. “The Index of Consumer Satisfaction Methodology,” Proceedings, Association for Consumer Research, 689–712.

  • Lord, Frederick M. 1963. “Elementary Models for Measuring Change,” in C.W. Harris (Ed.),Problems in Measuring Change, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, David. 1965,Test Theory, Palo Alto, Calif.: Addison Wesley. Oliver, Richard L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions”,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XVII (November), pp. 460–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J.W., and Kelley, H.H. 1959.The Social Psychology of Groups, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prakash, V. Validity and reliability of the confirmation of expectations paradigm as a determinant of consumer satisfaction. JAMS 12, 63–76 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721800

Keywords

Navigation