Cognitive errors in diagnosis: Instantiation, classification, and consequences

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(89)90342-2Get rights and content

Abstract

To identify diagnostic errors caused by faulty clinical cognition, we analyzed 40 consecutive transcripts of problem-solving exercises published in a pedagogic series of clinical reasoning. The analysis disclosed multiple errors in cognition and produced a provisional classification of these errors based on a framework derived from cognitive science. Faults in cognition were identified in all steps of the diagnostic process, including triggering, context formulation, information gathering and processing, and verification. We instantiated each type of error by providing detailed specific examples, and identified the consequences of each error. We conclude that cognitive errors can be identified and classified, that they can produce serious morbidity, and that a classification of cognitive errors is a step toward a deeper understanding of the epidemiology, causes, and prevention of diagnostic errors.

References (78)

  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A comatose alcoholic

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A young Chinese man with severe weakness

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A woman with refractory diarrhea for five months

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A hirsute woman with weakness and weight gain

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A man with severe valvular heart disease

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Hypoglycemic coma in a high school dropout

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A woman with a persistently high sedimentation rate

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A surprising cause of abdominal pain, anorexia, vomiting, and weight loss

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Diarrhea, abdominal pain, and long-standing ulcerative colitis

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Watch and wait, or operate?

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A young postman with abdominal pain and diarrhea

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    All that glisters is not gold

    Hosp Pract

    (1985)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Postural hypotension and confusing chemistries

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Treat—or keep testing?

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Wrong diagnosis, wrong tests, wrong treatment

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A fatal flaw in Sutton's law

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Renal rescue by the Reverend Bayes

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    The bypass on the way to the bypass

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A picture is worth a thousand words

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    An apple or an orange?

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A defective detective

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    A test of clinical judgment

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Better late than never

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • FA Sonnenberg et al.

    An autopsy of the clinical reasoning process

    Hosp Pract

    (1986)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Leaving no stone unturned

    Hosp Pract

    (1987)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    The case of causal reasoning

    Hosp Pract

    (1987)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    It's what you believe that counts

    Hosp Pract

    (1987)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Tolerating uncertainty

    Hosp Pract

    (1987)
  • JP Kassirer et al.

    Clinical cognition 101

    Hosp Pract

    (1987)
  • Cited by (166)

    • Bias analysis in forensic and non-forensic psychiatric assessments

      2023, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
    • Watson for Oncology and breast cancer treatment recommendations: Agreement with an expert multidisciplinary tumor board

      2018, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Treatment decisions might not change because of this transparency, but learning would be fostered. Use of a CDSS may also help assure more standardization of treatment when appropriate, decreasing the vagaries of therapy that can occur when personal preference or well-known cognitive biases dominate individuals’ decisions [11, 12]. Finally, lack of concordance does not necessarily provide evidence regarding whether the MMDT or WFO was ‘correct’ in its recommendation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by Grant 5 RO1 LMO4493 from the National Library of Medicine.

    View full text