An exploration of opinion and practice patterns affecting low use of antenatal corticosteroids

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90220-1Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Quality metrics for optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration

    2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Citation Excerpt :

    No other obstetrical intervention has been shown to have such diverse and consistent benefits for preterm newborns as antenatal corticosteroids. After the publication of the initial trial showing the benefits of antenatal corticosteroids in 1972,13 clinical uptake of their administration remained limited for decades.14–17 In 2013, The Joint Commission (TJC) established a perinatal core quality measure (Perinatal Care Measure 03 [PC-03]) that assessed a hospital’s rate of antenatal corticosteroid administration before early preterm births.18

  • What we have learned about antenatal corticosteroid regimens

    2016, Seminars in Perinatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite this dramatic improvement, for 2 decades relatively few preterm infants actually benefited from antenatal steroid treatment.8 Unwarranted fears about potential side effects and concerns about the quality of evidence caused many physicians to be hesitant to adopt antenatal steroid treatment into routine clinical practice.9 Because of this, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) held a consensus conference in 1994 to review the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids.10

  • Prescribing patterns of antenatal corticosteroids in women with threatened preterm labor

    2015, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) improve the outcome of premature neonates born before 34 weeks of gestation [3–6]. Two decades have passed since the first publication on the reduction of the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) by ACS before ACS were implemented following a recommendation by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to administer ACS to all women at risk of PTD between 24 and 34 weeks’ gestation [7–9]. Difficulty in accurate prediction of preterm delivery in the short term and a possible diminishing effect of ACS over time, with an optimal interval of 7–14 days between ACS and delivery, resulted in routinely repetition of ACS in the 1990s [10–17].

  • Antenatal Corticosteroids in the Management of Preterm Birth: Are We Back Where We Started?

    2012, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Over the next few decades, additional studies corroborated the findings of Liggins and Howie. However, concerns about the quality of the evidence and fears about potential side effects made obstetric providers hesitant to use this therapy routinely for women at risk for preterm birth.7,8 In 1990, Crowley and colleagues published a meta-analysis of 12 RCTs of antenatal corticosteroids, demonstrating that this therapy significantly reduced RDS and other neonatal morbidities such as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) as well as overall neonatal mortality.9

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research contract No. DHHS 282-92-0055.

View full text