Original article
Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90085-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Although most clinicians agree that patients should be informed about treatment alternatives, little is known about the way patients perceive probabilistic information about treatment outcomes and how it influences the choices they make. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of level and framing of probability on preferences for cancer treatment alternatives in which tradeoffs between quantity and quality of life are made. 129 healthy volunteers and 154 cancer patients indicated their preferences for a toxic treatment over a non-toxic treatment at varying survival probabilities. Subjects responded to questions in one of three randomly assigned conditions: (1) a positive frame in which the probability of survival was given; (2) a negative frame in which the probability of dying was given; and (3) a mixed frame in which the probability of surviving and dying were both given. The cancer patients' preferences for the more effective toxic treatment was significantly stronger than the healthy volunteers. Both groups were significantly influenced by the level of probability that was presented. Preferences for the toxic treatment were weaker when the chance of survival dropped below 50%. This weakening preference below 50% survival was enhanced for subjects who responded in the negative frame. A negative frame or probability level below 0.5 would seem to stimulate a “dying mode” type of value system in which quality of life becomes more salient in decision making than quantity of life. The implications in eliciting informed consent from patients are discussed.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (141)

  • Choose Your Words Wisely: The Impact of Message Framing on Patients’ Responses to Treatment Advice

    2018, International Review of Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Both the cancer patients' and the healthy controls' choices were significantly influenced by the probability percentage that was presented. Preferences for the toxic treatment were less preferred when the chance of survival were dropped below 50% (O'Connor, 1989). This weakening of preference was enhanced in subjects who were given the outcome was framed negatively (expressed as chance of dying greater than 50%).

  • Breaking bad news: Effects of forecasting diagnosis and framing prognosis

    2016, Patient Education and Counseling
    Citation Excerpt :

    Framing does not lead to universal optimism (or pessimism) about the future, but negative framing was associated with reduced hope in domains directly related to the physician’s discussion of prognosis, such as chances of living 10 years and living longer than expected. These findings are consistent with previous research showing that positive framing increases patients’ willingness to accept medical treatment by manipulating perceptions of the risk of side effects [61,62]. However, more work is needed to understand the complex relationships between framing, other factors relevant within a prognostic conversation, and the multiple outcomes that are important following these conversations, including psychological adjustment over time and shared decision-making [53].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text