Are Monitored Telemetry Beds Necessary for Patients With Nontraumatic Chest Pain and Normal or Nonspecific Electrocardiograms?
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
We thank the emergency department nurses, physicians, and academic associates for their assistance with patient enrollment, and Jason Cullin and Sultan Khan for their assistance with data management.
References (6)
- et al.
Outcomes of patients hospitalized to a telemetry unit
Am J Cardiol
(1994) - et al.
Role of telemetry monitoring in the non-intensive care unit
Am J Cardiol
(1995) - et al.
Outcome in suspected acute myocardial infarction with normal or minimally abnormal admission electrocardiogram findings
Am J Cardiol
(1987)
Cited by (38)
Lessons Learned from Efforts to Reduce Overuse of Cardiac Telemetry Monitoring
2020, Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient SafetyEmergency department monitor alarms rarely change clinical management: An observational study
2020, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Until a combination of hardware and software technologies emerge to produce a highly sensitive and highly specific monitoring system, more selective monitoring may be key to reducing alarm frequency and the resulting alarm fatigue. For example, many patients monitored in the ED or admitted to telemetry beds are low-risk patients with chest pain, and multiple studies have shown little to no benefit of monitoring in this group [19-23]. EDs could implement protocols to restrict continuous monitoring only to patients with significant potential for clinical decline based on the treating clinician's judgement.
Telemetry Monitoring: Indications and Strategies to Reduce Overuse
2017, Hospital Medicine Clinics2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry
2017, Heart RhythmCitation Excerpt :Monitoring low-risk patients who are unlikely to experience cardiac arrhythmias may yield a disproportionate ratio of false alarms including noise artifact and ECG lead failures. For example, arrhythmia yield was only 1.5% in one study of “low-risk” hospitalized patients admitted with chest pain and normal or nonspecific ECG findings (Hollander et al., 1997). The AHA practice guidelines in 2004 (Drew et al., 2004) omitted many commonly applied telemetry indications including stroke evaluation, hypoxemic respiratory disorders, proarrhythmic acid/base disorders, and exposures to pro-arrhythmic drugs (dofetilide, sotalol) or illicit substances (cocaine, amphetamines, alcohol intoxication) (Henriques-Forsythe et al., 2009).
Over-monitoring and alarm fatigue: For whom do the bells toll?
2013, Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical CareElectrocardiographic monitoring in the hospitalized patient: a diagnostic intervention of uncertain clinical impact
2008, American Journal of Emergency Medicine