Data Base Panel
Measuring for improvement: from Toyota to thoracic surgery

Presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 26–28, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00547-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Measuring quality has become a high priority in the era of managed care. Nevertheless, it can be counterproductive to use the same methods for measuring improvement in surgical procedures and processes as we use for measurement in basic research. Techniques of statistical process control have been used for many years to measure process improvement in industry and are now being applied to health care.

Methods. Examples of using statistical process control charts to monitor coronary artery bypass grafting mortality, intensive care unit admission time, and length of stay are reviewed.

Results. The major advantage of using control chart methodology is that it allows one to determine whether the process being evaluated is in fact stable and to detect when significant or special cause variation occurs.

Conclusions. Summary statistics currently provided to purchasers of care and regulatory agencies do not ensure that the processes being evaluated are stable. We need to look at data over time with statistically validated methods such as control charts to better monitor our processes of care and thereby provide accurate statistics.

References (6)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (25)

  • Early recognition and response to increases in surgical site infections using optimised statistical process control charts—The early 2RIS trial: A multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial

    2022, eClinicalMedicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the traditional approach for SSI surveillance has major deficiencies that can lead to delayed or failed detection of important SSI rate increases or outbreaks, precluding timely feedback and investigation. For example, traditional statistical techniques require aggregation of SSI data over time, delaying analysis until sufficient data accumulate (e.g., each year).16,17 Also, comparisons to static external benchmarks, such as past SSI rates published in national or international surveys18–20 may not detect important changes in SSI rates experienced by individual hospitals.21

  • Statistical Process Control (SPC) to drive improvement in length of stay after colorectal surgery

    2020, American Journal of Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Unstable and unexpected processes can be stabilized, making it possible for process improvement measures to be successfully initiated. After years of using SPC in industry, the tool is being applied to health care for surgical quality improvement, including reducing surgical site infections, unplanned reoperations, and streamlining cardiac surgical care.11–15 SPC could help identify the specific institutional practices that lead to outliers and unexpected outcomes.

  • Application of quality improvement to surgical practice

    2000, Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    These studies suggest that quality improvement methodology may enhance the success of existing organized approaches to practice evaluation. However, quality improvement methods should not be viewed as a magic formula or be construed as the only method useful for improvement, but rather as a useful series of steps for implementing changes in a systematic fashion.27 Indeed, today's quality improvement methods and concepts will likely evolve into tomorrow's next generation, more powerful improvement methods and concepts.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text