Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery
Introduction
Fractures of the hip, which most commonly occur in the elderly, are associated with a very high mortality. With increasing life expectancy these injuries are on the increase and will thus continue to be a substantial workload for trauma departments. The elderly are the most prone to such fractures because of their frequent falls (due to impaired balance and co-ordination) and the high prevalence of osteoporosis in this age group.7., 11. Operative treatment of such fractures is usually straight forward, but post-operative recovery and rehabilitation is fraught with complications.
One year mortality following hip fracture surgery is remarkably high, and is usually around 26%2 but has been reported to range from 14 to 36%. It is highest during the first 6 months after injury, and after the first year it approaches that of patients with similar age and sex.5., 6. One factor which can possibly affect 1 year mortality is the waiting time for surgery. Various studies have addressed this issue with conflicting conclusions. The purpose of this study is to examine whether waiting time for surgery affects 1 year mortality.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
This retrospective study is based around a change in patient management practice regarding the time to surgery for hip fracture.
The hospital where the study was carried out is a busy general hospital which treats all hip fractures occurring in Malta. Before June 1995, the hospital had one theatre dedicated to orthopaedics. This theatre used to cater for both trauma and elective procedures. Planned elective lists were carried out in the morning, and the rest of theatre time was used for
Results
Patient details in the two cohorts are compared in Table 1.
The 1 year mortality rate for cohort 1 (DHS and hemiarthroplasty) was 16.8% (28 patients) compared to 26.9% (53 patients) of the patients from for cohort 2. The difference in mortality is 10.1% which is statistically significant (P<0.025, χ2=5.3).
Thirty-day mortality was 4.2% (7 patients) for cohort 1 and 5.3% (12 patients) for cohort 2, with 1.8% difference in mortality.
One year mortality for patients having a DHS was 17.5% (24
Discussion
The patients in this study form part of a stable population living in Malta and the majority of patients are of Caucasian origin. The patients selected for each of the two cohorts were operated during separate non overlapping time periods. Placement in either of the cohorts was not subjective to any condition other than the date of operation.
We found significantly lower 1 year mortality after hip fracture surgery in the shorter time to surgery group when compared to the longer time for surgery
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Health Information Unit, Department of Health, Malta, Mr. J. Sciberras MRCS, Mr. C. Sciberras FRCS and Mr. M. Gatt MRCS for their help in this study.
References (12)
- et al.
Factors influencing survival following fractures of the upper end of the femur
Injury
(1986) - et al.
Prospective, multi-centre trial of mortality following general or spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in the elderly
Br. J. Anaesth.
(1987) The surgical treatment of the fractured hip
Surg. Clin. North Am.
(1951)- et al.
Hip fracture mortality and morbidity—can we do better?
N. Z. Med. J.
(2001) - et al.
An analysis of 950 fatal injuries
Surgery
(1964) - et al.
Hip fracture mortality
Clin. Orthop.
(1984)