Association for Surgical Education
Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI) consists of clinical scenarios in which bench-top models are positioned to simulated patients. Trainees are required to perform technical skills while engaging with the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an IPPI format examination could discriminate between different levels of trainees.

Methods

Sixteen fourth-year medical students and 16 first-year surgery residents participated in 4 IPPI scenarios. Videotaped performances were scored by 2 blinded independent clinician raters on previously validated instruments: checklist of technical skills, Global Rating Scale of technical skills, and communication scale. We conducted separate mixed design analyses of variance (level × cases) on the 3 scales.

Results

Residents performed better than medical students on the checklist (74% vs 60%, P < .05), the Global Rating Scale of technical skills (75% vs 56%, P < .01), and the coherence communication subscale (79% vs 69%, P < .05).

Conclusions

An IPPI examination discriminated between students' and residents' technical skills and coherence in communication skills. It also highlighted a potential gap in the training of residents' communication skills.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants consisted of 16 fourth-year undergraduate medical students and 16 surgical residents at the end of their first postgraduate year in a large Canadian medical school. All participants took part in the study at the end of the academic year (May). Participants received a modest monetary honorarium for the time required to participate in this study. Research ethics approval was conducted by the relevant academic health sciences center and university research ethics boards.

Experimental design

Each

Global rating scales

The GRS scores on the 4-scenario IPPI examination yielded an IRR of .76 (intraclass correlation) and an α of .75.

The results of the mixed-design analysis of variable revealed a main effect of group (F1,29, 42.44; MSE, .025; P = .000; eta2 = .59), a main effect of scenario (F3,87, 19.92; MSE, .015; P = .000; eta2 = .41), but no significant scenario by group interaction (F3,87, 1.03; MSE, .015; P = .38; eta2 = .03). As can be observed in Fig. 1, the residents obtained higher GRS scores on the

Comments

The results of this study provide some preliminary psychometric properties of an IPPI examination in surgical skills. The results show that a 4-scenario IPPI examination showed acceptable levels of interrater reliability on assessments of the technical and the communication components of performance. The IRR was lower for the communication scale, suggesting that communication skills are more difficult to assess and may be more susceptible to individual differences in rater definitions of good

Acknowledgments

This study was graciously funded by a research grant from the Medical Council of Canada.

References (12)

  • J.A. Martin et al.

    Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents

    Br J Surg

    (1997)
  • G. Regehr et al.

    Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination

    Acad Med

    (1998)
  • B. Hodges et al.

    Evaluating communication skills in the OSCE format: reliability and generalizability

    Med Educ

    (1996)
  • B. Hodges et al.

    Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training

    Med Educ

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (58)

  • Simulation-based training in cardiology: State-of-the-art review from the French Commission of Simulation Teaching (Commission d'enseignement par simulation–COMSI) of the French Society of Cardiology

    2021, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
    Citation Excerpt :

    Beyond technical skills, simulation in interventional cardiology tackles non-technical and human factors. Hybrid simulation is one way to mix modalities to enhance the training experience, such as performing radial puncture on an arm simulator with a standardized patient who mimics anxiety or aggression [36]. Simulation is relevant for learning cardiovascular imaging with echocardiography, both transthoracic (TTE) and transoesophageal (TEE).

  • An observational study of technical and non-technical skills in advanced life support in the clinical setting

    2020, Resuscitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous studies have documented a positive correlation between NTS and TS in simulated ALS scenarios by anaesthesiologist7,11,12 as well as in both simulated13 and in real-life14,15 situations in surgery and obstetric emergencies.16 Even though it is known that a significant number of avoidable incidents occurring during operative procedures are linked to failures in NTS,15 there are some studies in which the correlation between these skills is only considered low,8–10 none at all5,6 or even negative.17 Even less is known if a certain part of NTS impacts on the overall ALS performance, or further, if excellent NTS improve TS in ALS.

  • Simulated and standardized patients

    2019, Clinical Simulation: Education, Operations and Engineering
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text