ReviewValidity of electronic surveillance systems: a systematic review
Introduction
Surveillance is defined as the ongoing, systematic collection of data regarding a health-related event for use in public health action to reduce morbidity and mortality and to improve health.1 Surveillance is a major part of hospital infection control programmes, and infection control practitioners devote more time to this activity than any other task.2 Traditionally infection surveillance is conducted through passive reporting systems such as with notifiable diseases, or by individual case identification and clinical review such as with hospital-based infection prevention and control programmes.3, 4 Automated or electronic surveillance of infectious diseases is the process of obtaining information from inter-related electronic databases for identifying infection distributions within a particular setting.5 With increasing use and availability of electronic patient data within healthcare institutions and in community settings, the potential for automated surveillance has been increasingly realised.4, 6, 7 Since these electronic data are usually routinely collected for other primary purposes, electronic surveillance systems may be developed and implemented with a potentially minimal incremental expense.
As a result of uncertainty surrounding its validity, electronic surveillance has not been widely adopted. Traditional, labour-intensive, manual infection surveillance methods remain the principal means of surveillance in most jurisdictions. Our objective was to systematically identify and appraise the published literature assessing the validity of electronic surveillance systems compared with conventional surveillance techniques.
Section snippets
Search strategies
A methodical search was conducted to identify published literature comparing the utility of routine, electronic or automated surveillance systems with conventional surveillance systems for infectious diseases. Both electronic and manual searches were used, the latter by scanning bibliographies of all evaluated articles and the author's files. No language restriction was used. The US National Library of Medicine's PubMed service was used to search Medline for relevant electronic articles
Results
A total of 2421 references were initially identified. Twenty-four fulfilled the predetermined inclusion criteria and were included in analysis. The flow of studies and reasons for exclusion are displayed in Figure 1. Table I, Table II, Table III, Table IV summarise each article included in this review. Most (21; 87%) of the included studies focused on nosocomial infections including surgical site infections (SSIs),9, 10, 11, 12, 13 central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections,4, 14, 15
Discussion
In this report we identify and summarise the published literature evaluating the utility of electronic surveillance systems. The body of literature on this topic is small and we only identified 24 studies that compared electronic with conventional surveillance. While several of the studies were focused on nosocomial infections, the populations and methodologies were heterogeneous. We therefore did not attempt to summarise their results using formal quantitative statistics. Based on included
References (32)
- et al.
Comparison of case-finding methodologies for endometritis after cesarean section
Am J Infect Control
(1995) - et al.
Linkage of microbiology reports and hospital discharge diagnoses for surveillance of surgical site infections
J Hosp Infect
(2005) - et al.
A comparison of two methods for identifying surgical site infections following orthopaedic surgery
J Hosp Infect
(2001) - et al.
Validation of a multicenter computer-based surveillance system for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care departments
Am J Infect Control
(2004) - et al.
Use of computerized surveillance to detect nosocomial pneumonia in neonatal intensive care unit patients
Am J Infect Control
(2005) - et al.
A new method for identifying antibiotic-treated infections using automated pharmacy records
J Clin Epidemiol
(2000) - et al.
Surveillance of hospital-acquired infections based on electronic hospital registries
J Hosp Infect
(2006) - et al.
Sensitivity of the Swedish statutory surveillance system for communicable diseases 1998–2002, assessed by the capture–recapture method
Epidemiol Infect
(2005) - et al.
Surveillance of nosocomial infections by computer analysis of positive culture rates
J Clin Microbiol
(1985) - et al.
Surveillance