We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
Log in

Morbidity and mortality conference

A survey of academic internal medicine departments

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to determine the prevalence and characteristics of morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MCs) in U.S. internal medicine training programs. Two hundred ninety-five of 416 (71%) surveys were returned. Ninety percent of programs have an M&MC. Most meet monthly, have a designated leader, and entail case discussions of 3 or fewer patients. Cases are selected on the basis of unexpected bad outcomes, teaching value, and to a lesser extent, suspected medical error. Two thirds of the sites use M&MCs to meet administrative requirements for quality assurance. M&MC, while prevalent in internal medicine training programs, has a heterogeneity of focus. Hence, the goals and role of the conference, as judged by this survey, do not appear to be well defined and may warrant further clarification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biddle C, Oaster TR. Investigating the nature of the morbidity and mortality conference. Acad Med. 1990;65:420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell B. Surgicalmorbidity and mortality meetings. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988;70:363–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosk CL. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. Chicago, Ill: Chicago University Press; 1979:220.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harbison SP, Regehr G. Faculty and resident opinions regarding the role of morbidity and mortality conference. Am J Surg. 1999;177:136–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson JS, Prior MA. Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference. J Surg Res. 1992;52:97–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG. The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med. 2002;77:1001–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon LA. Gordon’s guide to the surgical morbidity and mortality conference. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley and Belfus Inc.; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320:726–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Error in medicine: what have we learned? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:763–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leape LL, Berwick DM. Safe health care: are we up to it? BMJ. 2000;320:725–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay D. Orlander MD, MPH.

Additional information

The name morbidity and mortality conference (M&MC), is universally familiar to physicians, yet a precise definition, format, or goals for this conference do not exist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orlander, J.D., Fincke, B.G. Morbidity and mortality conference. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 656–658 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20824.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20824.x

Key Words

Navigation