ReviewError in Radiology
References (87)
- et al.
The value of specialist oncological radiology review of cross-sectional imaging
Clin Radiol
(1999) - et al.
Avoidance of variability and error in radiology
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice
Chest
(1999) - et al.
An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs
Clin Radiol
(1997) - et al.
Wessex Regional Radiology Audit: barium enema in colorectal carcinoma
Clin Radiol
(1995) - et al.
Detection and follow-up of important extra-arterial lesions with helical CT angiography
Clin Radiol
(1999) - et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of cervical nodal metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Clin Radiol
(1999) Review. Measuring the effects of image interpretation: an evaluative framework
Clin Radiol
(2001)- et al.
Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double-blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologists and radiographer
Clin Radiol
(2000) - et al.
Job stress and satisfaction among clinical radiologists
Clin Radiol
(2000)
Relationships between radiologists and clinicians: results from three surveys
Clin Radiol
Job stress and satisfaction among clinical radiologists
Clin Radiol
An Organisation with a Memory: Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the NHS
Building a Safer NHS for Patients
Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review
Br Med J
Let's talk about error
Br Med J
Executive summary
To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System
An Organisation with a Memory
Human error: models and management
Br Med J
An Organisation with a Memory: Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the NHS
Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Roentgen image
Br J Radiol
Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference
Radiology
Radiology and medical malpractice claims: a report of the practice standards claims survey of the Physician Insurers Association of America and the American College of Radiology
Am J Roentgenol
The Use of Computed Tomography in the Initial Investigation of Common Malignancies
Helical CT in the evaluation of the acute abdomen
Am J Roentgenol
Assessing the resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: the value of reinterpreting abdominal CT performed at other institutions
Am J Roentgenol
Multi-detector CT of the pancreas and bile duct system: value of curved planar reformations
Am J Roentgenol
Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs
Br J Radiol
Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT
Radiology
Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films
Br J Radiol
Satisfaction of search in osteo-radiology
Am J Roentgenol
Response to the General Medical Council Determination on the Bristol Case
Emerging technologies
Am J Roentgenol
Possessing ordinary knowledge
Am J Roentgenol
Radiation therapy of suspected brain tumour without definitive diagnosis
Am J Roentgenol
Pulmonary nodules resected at video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: etiology in 426 patients
Radiology
Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer
Radiology
Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans
Radiology
Clinically serious abnormalities found incidentally at MR imaging of the brain: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study
Radiology
Is it necessary to biopsy the obvious?
Am J Roentgenol
Decision making in radiology
Radiology
Measuring performance in chest radiography
Radiology
Pitfalls of the vague radiology report
Am J Roentgenol
Cited by (188)
Ultrasound technology assisted colloidal nanocrystal synthesis and biomedical applications
2024, Ultrasonics SonochemistryDeep learning-based recurrence detector on magnetic resonance scans in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter study
2023, European Journal of RadiologyImpact of Shift Volume on Neuroradiology Diagnostic Errors at a Large Tertiary Academic Center
2023, Academic RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Oculomotor fatigue tends to be present at the end of a shift, and it could be a potential cause of making errors later in a day or on a busy workday (35–37). Our proportion of perceptual errors (83%) and clinically significant errors (91.1%) is at the upper end of the range that is reported in the literature (5,11,22,34,38–44). There are many variables that predispose to radiologic errors, including type I heuristic thinking (fast quick thinking), cognitive biases (e.g., availability bias, framing bias, satisfaction of search bias), systematic errors (e.g., workplace interruptions, understaffing, software failure), longer shift length, and increased shift volume (34,38,39,45).
- f1
Author for correspondence: R. FitzGerald, Department of Radiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 OQP, U.K. Fax: +44(0)1902 644820.