ORIGINAL ARTICLEPilot Study of Providing Online Care in a Primary Care Setting
Section snippets
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The pilot study was conducted from November 2007 through October 2009 in the Department of Family Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The Department of Family Medicine averages 56 clinicians practicing in 4 clinics in and around Rochester. The study aimed to learn about the potential for online visits in preparation for construction of an online patient portal to be used for the entire institution. Numerous restrictions were placed on the pilot. The project did not receive publicity and was
RESULTS
During the 2-year study period, 4282 patients were registered for the service, which led to 2531 online consultations and billings for 1159 patients (52%) (Figure 2). During the last 11 months of the study, expansion of registrations and e-visits was discouraged because of the expected release of a new Mayo Clinic portal. There was no billing for the first 4 months of the pilot, during which 299 visits occurred. After 6 months, a 1-month pause occurred in adding registrations (April 2008) to
DISCUSSION
The current study was a regulated pilot of online visits in a primary care setting. Most users were working-aged women who completed e-visits for themselves, their dependents, and their older parents during office hours. The clinicians were not overburdened by repeated visits during the study period or by overwhelming numbers of patients needing assistance.
Patient concerns were wide-ranging, with the top 20 diagnoses making up only 55% of the conditions. Other conditions varied from a request
CONCLUSION
The current pilot study of e-visits in a primary care practice showed the feasibility of online visits to educate, treat, and bill patients. The extent of conditions possible for treatment by online care was far-ranging and was managed with a minimum of message exchanges by using structured histories. Processes previously given as a free service or from nurse triage and subject to malpractice (protocols) were now documented and billed. Patients showed that they could upload digital images and
REFERENCES (35)
- et al.
Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. [published correction appears in J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(2):265]
J Am Med Inform Assoc
(2007) - et al.
Effect of an Internet-based system for doctor-patient communication on health care spending
J Am Med Inform Assoc
(2005) - et al.
Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework
Contemp Clin Trials
(2008) The patient-computer interview: a neglected tool that can aid the clinician
Mayo Clin Proc
(2003)The TransfMed patient-centered model. TransformMED Web site
- et al.
“Patient portals” and “e-visits”
J Ambul Care Manage
(2006) - et al.
The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap
Health Aff (Millwood)
(2005) - et al.
An internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial
J Med Internet Res
(2005) - et al.
Patient-physician web messaging: the impact on message volume and satisfaction
J Gen Intern Med
(2005) - et al.
Web messaging: a new tool for patient-physician communication
J Am Med Inform Assoc
(2003)
Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery
Pediatrics
Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial
BMJ
Using the Internet to enhance the treatment of depression
Australas Psychiatry
Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment
Telemed J E Health
Low-cost, email-based system for self blood pressure monitoring at home
J Telemed Telecare
Internet and email use among STD clinic patients
Sex Transm Dis
Electronic communication with patients for breastfeeding support
J Hum Lact
Cited by (77)
Advancing the Science of E-Visits in Primary Care
2019, Mayo Clinic ProceedingsAsynchronous Telemedicine: A Systematic Literature Review
2023, Telemedicine ReportsMcIsaac score for group A streptococcal infection: Comparison of electronic visits versus face-to-face visits
2023, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
This article is freely available on publication, because the authors have chosen the immediate access option.
An earlier version of this article appeared Online First.