Similar articles for PMID: 23322750

Year	Number of Results
1977	1
1988	1
1989	5
1992	2
1993	3
1996	5
2001	2
2002	2
2003	2
2004	1
2005	3
2006	1
2007	2
2008	2
2009	2
2010	4
2011	5
2012	14
2013	8
2014	11
2015	5
2016	5
2017	8
2018	8
2019	4
2020	8
2021	4
2022	3
2023	1
2024	0

1

Identifying optimal postmarket surveillance strategies for medical and surgical devices: implications for policy, practice and research.

Gagliardi AR, Umoquit M, Lehoux P, Ross S, Ducey A, Urbach DR. Gagliardi AR, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):210-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001298. Epub 2013 Jan 15. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013. PMID: 23322750

2

Implementing unique device identification in electronic health record systems: organizational, workflow, and technological challenges.

Campion TR Jr, Johnson SB, Paxton EW, Mushlin AI, Sedrakyan A. Campion TR Jr, et al. Med Care. 2014 Jan;52(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000012. Med Care. 2014. PMID: 24322986

3

Oversight overhaul: eliminating the premarket review of medical devices and implementing a provider-centered postmarket surveillance strategy.

Scott B. Scott B. Food Drug Law J. 2011;66(3):377-404, ii. Food Drug Law J. 2011. PMID: 24505854

4

Unique device identifiers for coronary stent postmarket surveillance and research: a report from the Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Epidemiology Network Unique Device Identifier demonstration.

Tcheng JE, Crowley J, Tomes M, Reed TL, Dudas JM, Thompson KP, Garratt KN, Drozda JP Jr; MDEpiNet UDI Demonstration Expert Workgroup. Tcheng JE, et al. Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):405-413.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 7. Am Heart J. 2014. PMID: 25262248 Review.

5

Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices.

Gagliardi AR, Ducey A, Lehoux P, Turgeon T, Ross S, Trbovich P, Easty A, Bell C, Urbach D. Gagliardi AR, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):190-198. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006481. Epub 2017 Aug 2. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018. PMID: 28768712 Free PMC article.

6

Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.

Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A. Chilcott J, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20501062 Free article. Review.

7

Ethics, economics and the regulation and adoption of new medical devices: case studies in pelvic floor surgery.

Ross S, Weijer C, Gafni A, Ducey A, Thompson C, Lafreniere R. Ross S, et al. BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Aug 26;11:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-14. BMC Med Ethics. 2010. PMID: 20738887 Free PMC article.

8

Postmarket surveillance for medical devices: America's new strategy.

Normand SL, Hatfield L, Drozda J, Resnic FS. Normand SL, et al. BMJ. 2012 Oct 11;345:e6848. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6848. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 23060660 No abstract available.

9

US and European postmarket clinical data requirements.

Donawa M. Donawa M. Med Device Technol. 2005 Mar;16(2):19-21. Med Device Technol. 2005. PMID: 15828495

10

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Bekkering GE, et al. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008. PMID: 19034813 German.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

112 results

Results by year