Criteria for producing good quality information for patients
| Duman & Farrell13 | CHIQ16 | Entwistle & O'Donnell15 |
|---|---|---|
| Informs about condition and available treatments and options | Accessibility: appropriate format | Clear statement of aims |
| Comprehensive, unbiased information about outcomes | Accuracy | Relevant |
| Outlines uncertainties and gaps in knowledge | Appropriateness | Accurate |
| Caters for people from a diverse range of backgrounds | Availability | Accessible, comprehensible, acceptable |
| Regularly reviewed and updated | Continuity: information is presented with other resources | Gives further sources of information |
| Integrated into a planned shared decision making programme | Currency: being up to date | Facilitates judgement about reliability of information |
| Simple and easily understood language and design | Legibility: clear presentation | |
| Originality (not duplicating other sources) | ||
| Patient involvement | ||
| Readability | ||
| Reliability |