Table 3

Evidence of effectiveness of quality management and quality system activities in nursing homes

SourceSetting and sampleDesignQA activityData collection and measurement instrumentDependent variableType of variableKey results
AHCPR = Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; OBRA = Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act; CARE = Continuous Assessment Review and Evaluation scheme.
Quality management
Dimant, 1991 (USA)Nursing home;189 bedsLongitudinalQuality system:
  • practice guidelines

  • design processes

  • indicator monitoring

  • participation residents

  • team approach

  • employee involvement

  • questionnaires

  • registration forms

  • medication errors

  • pressure ulcers

  • physical restraints

  • incidence accidents

  • satisfaction resident

Outcome
  • less than 0.1% medication errors and pressure ulcers

  • physical restraints reduced by 50%

  • improved mobility independence

  • decreased incidence of accidents

  • low prescriptions of psychoactive medication

  • improved resident satisfaction

1 Process control based on standards
Levine et al, 1994 (USA)Nursing facility; 816 bedsPost-test only
  • pressure ulcer prevention protocol

  • indicator specific audit instrument for monitoring

  • documentation of all aspects of ulcer care

  • data collection

  • feedback weekly and monthly

Prevalence of nosomial ulcerOutcome
  • low nosomial ulcer prevalence rate of 3.1% compared to 23% in USA nursing homes

Suntken et al, 1996 (USA)Two extended care facilities (n=160 residents); 2 acute care facilities (n=97); 2 home health agencies (n=91)Pre-test/post-testAHCPR pressure ulcer prevention and treatment guidelineTrained registered nurses and team members assessed clientsPrevalence of pressure ulcerOutcome
  • pre-test: 13 residents (21%) had 16 pressure ulcers

  • post-test: 1 resident (2%) had 5 pressure ulcers

Moseley, 1996 (USA)Two cohorts with 3149 and 5078 residents in nursing homesPre-test/post-testFederal regulations: the OBRA catheterisation standard
  • data based on automated assessment database

  • audit assessment data

Difference in percentages of pre-OBRA and post-OBRA residents catheterisedProcess
  • 1.3% of post-OBRA residents were catheterised long term v 8–15% pre-OBRA

  • 1% of long term catheterisations were inappropriately catheterised at assessment

Semla et al, 1994 (USA)485 bed nursing homePost-test onlyFederal regulations: the use of psychotropic drugs12 month chart review of 107 residents
  • prescription of neuroleptic drugs

  • dose of neuroleptic drugs

Process
  • in 75% of residents studied an attempt was made to lower or stop the dose of neuroleptic treatment: neuroleptics were discontinued in 45% with dementia and in 25% with psychiatric diagnosis

Shorr et al, 1994 (USA)9432 residents in nursing homesLongitudinalFederal regulations: the use of psychotropic drugsAssessment data of residents during 30 monthsNeuroleptic drug use in days/100 days of residenceProcess
  • neuroleptic drug use decreased from 23.9 to 17.5 days/100 days of residence (27%)

  • one quarter of facilities had no change or increased usage, another quarter had decreases of 46% or more variations were affected by staffing patterns

2 Process improvement by quality improvement procedures
Fitzgerald et al, 1996 (USA)9 nursing facilitiesPost-test only
  • measurement system of quality assurance

  • feedback benchmarking information

Quality indicators based on minimum data set resident assessments15 patient-related measures, e.g. prevalence of falls, weight loss, tube feedingProcess/ outcome
  • 6 scores below state average

  • 3 scores above average

  • 6 scores did not change

Phillips et al, 1997 (USA)254 nursing homes; 2000 nursing home residentsPre-test/ post-testResident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and care planningAssessment of all residents at baseline and 6 months later by research nurses using the minimum data set (MDS)
  • functional status

  • cognitive status

  • psychosocial wellbeing

OutcomeImplementation of the RAI reduced the rate of decline in 7 of the 9 outcomes
Hawes et al, 1997 (USA)254 nursing homes; >2000 residentsPre-test/ post-testRAI (standardised system to assist in assessment and care planning)
  • assessment of residents

  • interviews with direct staff

  • interviews with and observation of residents

  • review of medical records

  • accuracy of information

  • comprehensiveness of care plans

  • use of physical restraints

  • psychotropic drug use

Process
  • increased accuracy of information in medical records

  • significant decline in physical restraints (37.4% to 28.1%) and indwelling urinary catheters (9.8% to 7%)

  • use of antipsychotic drugs was unaffected

Fries et al, 1997 (USA)254 nursing homes; 2088 nursing home residentsPre-test/ post-testImplementation of the RAIAssessment of residents at baseline and 6 months later using the MDSPresence/absence of:
  • falls; pain

  • decubitus

  • vision problems

  • stasis ulcer

  • dental problems

  • malnutrition

  • dehydration

Outcome
  • lower prevalence of dehydration and stasis ulcer

  • fewer residents declined in nutrition state and vision

  • increase in prevalence of daily pain

Mor et al, 1997 (USA)268 nursing facilities; 4196 residentsPre-test/ post-testImplementation of the RAI
  • research nurse reviewed records, interviewed staff and observed residents

  • resident assessment data

Transitions during interval of 6 months: hospital admission, nursing home transfer, discharge to homeProcessDecline in hospitalisation: 15.9% in 1990 and 10.9% in 1993
Chambers et al, 1996 (USA)16 nursing homes; 138 residentsPre-test/post-test
  • nurse audit facilitator

  • audit projects

  • satisfaction questionnaire

  • geriatric depressions score

  • satisfaction resident

  • depression score

Outcome
  • satisfaction levels improved in 6 out of 11 aspects

  • mean geriatric depression score fell from 4.73 to 4.25

Challiner, 1997 (UK)Nursing home; 28 residentsPre-test/ post-testCARE scheme: clinical audit package examining 9 aspects of geriatric nursing careAudit form filled in for each resident and audit meetings to evaluate the audit formsPolicy with regard to
  • urinary/faecal continence

  • drug use

  • falls/accidents

  • pressure sores

  • environment and equipment

  • aids and adaptations

  • medical role

  • preserving autonomy

Process
  • increased documentation of residents' goals

  • policy for incontinence, increased monitoring

  • policy for and less evidence of clinical problems

  • more thorough assessment of individual falls

  • pressure sores monitored daily instead of weekly

  • no change in equipment

  • staff trained in use of hoist

  • improved recording in care plans

Dickinson et al, 1997 (UK)15 long term care facilities; 337 and 258 residentsPre-test/post-testCARE scheme: auditing the care of residents, discussing results, setting objectivesAudit form filled in for all residents and again 8 months laterPolicy with regard to:
  • urinary/faecal continence

  • drug use

  • falls/accidents

  • pressure sores

  • environment and equipment

  • medical role

  • preserving autonomy

Process
  • 42% of facilities developed policies for care (32% already had policies)

  • standard of policies became better, fewer missing components (reduced from 38% to 19%)

  • no change in policies of optimising drug use

  • 72% had reached the care standard for residents (increase of 4% in drug use and environment)

  • no change in policies for urinary continence

Mohide et al, 1988 (Canada)60 nursing homes; 1525 residentsControlled trial
  • service of a quality assurance consultant

  • working through a quality assurance cycle for two indicator conditions

  • record review

  • assessment forms

Change score of:
  • urinary incontinence

  • constipation

  • potential skin breakdown

  • hazardous mobility

Outcome
  • improvement in the conditions of hazardous mobility and constipation was greater in exp. group

  • no differences for the hidden conditions: potential skin breakdown and urinary incontinence

Gustafson, 1992 (USA)60 nursing homesControlled trialTwo different facility and resident assessment processesQuality of care assessment by a research team using interviews and observations
  • overall quality of care

  • detection of problems

  • recidivism of problems

  • unnotified problems

  • cost of methods

Process/outcome
  • assessment method helps better to detect problems and at the same time to reduce the costs of the survey process

  • many process improvements will not occur without external review

3 Human resources management
Richmond et al, 1996 (USA)Long term care psychiatric facility; 773 incidents of disruptive behaviourPre-test/post-testTraining on prevention and management of disturbed behaviour (critical moment) and monthly feedback of resultsSelf-developed criteria to determine whether patients were appropriately assessed and managed
  • use of seclusion

  • use of restraints

Process
  • one-to-one verbal intervention followed by medication mainly used alternative

  • seclusion hours decreased by 31%

  • restraint hours decreased by 47%

Avorn et al, 1992 (USA)12 nursing homesControlled trialEducational programme to reduce potentially excessive use of psychoactive drugs
  • evaluation drug use

  • follow up evaluation

Index of psychoactive drug useProcessDecline of 27% in experimental group v 8% in controls
Ray et al, 1993 (USA)4 nursing homesControlled trialEducational programme for physicians, nurses, staff
  • evaluation drug use

Total number of days of drug useProcessDrug use decreased by 72% in experimental group v 13% in controls
Schnelle et al, 1993 (USA)7 nursing homes; 340 residentsPre-test/post-testStaff training toileting programme
  • random hour check of residents for incontinence

  • toileting chart

Prevalence of incontinence in residentsOutcomeSignificant reduction in incontinence from 43% to 21%
4 Involvement of residents
Cherry, 1993 (USA)210 nursing homesPost-test onlyNursing home ombudsman who can visit residents and resolve disputes on their behalfTwo sources of secondary data: (1) collected during inspection, e.g. staffing patterns, resident status; (2) annual survey of ombudsman programmes
  • bedsores

  • catheterisations

  • two infection measures

  • sum of compliance with eight standards

Process/outcome
  • significant support for the hypothesis that the existence of ombudsman programmes can have an impact on patient related outcomes

  • no relationship was found between presence of ombudsman and compliance with standards

5 Quality assurance documents
No studies were found