Leadership rating scale used to rate performance in shared leadership and assertion in ‘getting the job done’
| Leadership scale |
|---|
| 6 - Members provided direction, instruction, and explanation to the team. They fully asserted themselves in drawing attention to team process and changing events. They were proactive in their effort to direct themselves and the team to relevant stimuli and process. Their shared leadership enhanced team function. |
| 5 – High level of enhancement to team function |
| 4 – Moderate enhancement to team function |
| 3 – They provided some evidence of leading themselves and the team. They made some suggestions but were not assertive enough to direct the team’s attention to process or events. Their shared leadership did not enhance nor hinder team function. |
| 2 – Low level of enhancement to team function |
| 1 – Team function compromised |
| 0 - They did not lead when they should have. They made little attempt to instruct when it was their responsibility to do so. They made no effort in directing the team when events dictated they should have done so. Their lack of shared leadership hindered team function. |