Table 5 Validation of the quality improvement maturity index through hypotheses testing
Hypotheses tested: output was related with maturity of the hospital’s QI systemOperationalisation of values testedDistribution of QI maturity classification (mean scores)
Number of items included(Cronbach α; n)Significant at p levelMost mature(⩽25%)Least mature(>75%)Total
External pressure9 (0.68; n = 126)<0.0011.71 (n = 78)2.75 (n = 76)2.25 (n = 310)
Safety*4 (0.24; n = 313)<0.0011.38 (n = 86)1.53 (n = 85)1.44 (n = 349)
Support for cross-border care patients6 (0.61; n = 298)<0.0011.60 (n = 86)1.76 (n = 84)1.96 (n = 346)
Distribution of quality improvement maturity classification (%)
Availability of AMI indicator: door-to-needle time: % yes10.1065.247.357.5
Availability of AMI indicator: aspirin <24 h after AMI: % yes10.0382.464.071.4
  • *To avoid overlap contamination in the measures and output, a modified QI maturity index was computed excluding all items related to safety.