Table 1

Characteristics of study sample (n=485)

Cases * Cases (cont'd)
Jurisdiction, n (%) Patient outcome, n (%)
 Victoria157 (32) Death36 (8)
 New South Wales130 (27) Physical injury41 (9)
 Western Australia87 (18) Psychiatric injury28 (6)
 New Zealand71 (15) Drug dependency66 (14)
 Queensland40 (8) Upset to patient126 (27)
Notifier, n (%)  Risk to patient72 (15)
 Patient or patient rep191 (50) No consequences24 (5)
 Court64 (17) Not applicable75 (16)
 Medical board or council56 (15)
 Other health professional20 (5) Doctors involved
 Other50 (13)Men, n (%)440 (91)
Number of patients, n (%)§ Years since qualification, mean (SD)21.4 (9.8)
 075 (16)Specialty, n (%)
 1240 (51) General practice285 (65)
 2+155 (33) Psychiatry43 (10)
 Surgery32 (7)
 Obstetrics/gynaecology24 (6)
 Other52 (11)
Previous misconduct matter, n (%)136 (28)
  • * All categories are mutually exclusive.

  • Percentages were calculated using the number of available observations as the denominator. Data were missing for doctor's sex in three cases (1%); number of patients in 15 cases (3%); patient outcome in 17 cases (3%); previous disciplinary action in 18 cases (4%); specialty in 49 cases (10%); notifier in 104 cases (21%); years since qualification in 118 cases (24%); and previous misconduct matter in 18 cases (4%).

  • One outcome recorded per case (the most severe) with outcomes shown in descending order of approximated severity. Percentages were calculated using the number of available observations as the denominator.

  • § Number of patients mentioned in tribunal's decision as having been affected by the conduct.