Italy | Netherlands | Poland | Spain | Sweden | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. How were the data collected? | |||||
2. Could the evidence (field work notes, interview transcripts, recordings, documentary analysis, etc.) be inspected independently by others? | |||||
3. How were themes and concepts identified from the data? | |||||
4. Who conducted the interviews, focus groups, process mapping, and artefact analyses? | |||||
5. Was the analysis repeated by more than one researcher to ensure reliability? | |||||
6. How were participants selected? for example, purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball | |||||
7. Method of approach—How were participants approached? eg,face-to-face, telephone, mail, email | |||||
8. Sample size—How many participants were in the study? How many people refused to participate or dropped out? | |||||
9. Interview guide | |||||
a. Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? | |||||
b. Was it pilot tested? | |||||
c. Is it being made available? | |||||
10. Focus group guide | |||||
a. Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? | |||||
b. Was it pilot tested? | |||||
c. Is it being made available? | |||||
11. Audio/visual recording—Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | |||||
12. How many data coders coded the data? | |||||
13. Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? |
Adapted from: Mays et al17 and Tong et al.18