Table 3

Poisson regression models predicting initiation/improved adherence to bundle components (N=73)

Model A: QI methodsModel B: hospital engagementModel C: QI methods and hospital engagementModel D: QI methods and type of hospital engagement
IRR95% CIIRR95% CIIRR95% CIIRR95% CI
Adherence to Project JOINTS QI methods1.16(0.96 to 1.40)1.04(0.87 to 1.26)1.04(0.86 to 1.26)
Hospital engagement1.12(1.03 to 1.22)**1.11(1.02 to 1.21)*
 Interactive campaign activities1.08(0.91 to 1.30)
 Campaign materials and tools1.13(1.01 to 1.27)*
Wald χ2148.05**133.72**137.52**141.89**
McFadden's R20.22990.24310.24360.2439
  • Results from Poisson regression with robust standard errors. All models controlled for state, rural/urban location, hospital size, surgery volume, previous Institute for Healthcare Improvement experience, previous surgical site infection experience and number of prior components.

  • The Wald χ2 statistic is used to determine whether at least one of the predictors’ regression coefficient is not equal to zero.

  • R2 indicates the proportion of the variation in the outcome variable due to the independent variables included.

  • *significant at p≤0.05; **significant at p≤0.01.

  • JOINTS, Joining Organizations IN Tackling SSIs; SSI, surgical site infection; QI, quality improvement; IRR, incidence rate ratio.